Placement of Adverbs

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 6:37 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:1 members

Placement of Adverbs

by eastcoastrocks » Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:36 am
I could solve OG12 Question Number 40, but I have a small doubt:

Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering bow the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at an invading microbe or foreign substance.

Will the sentence will be correct even if it was 'specifically targeted'? Is there any general rule for the same?
Source: — Sentence Correction |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: US
Thanked: 527 times
Followed by:227 members

by e-GMAT » Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:59 am
"specifically targeted" and "targeted specifically" mean the same thing.

In both expressions, "specifically" modifies the verb - targeted.

We can see some other OG questions as well in which adverb is placed before or after the verb:

1: Unlike the honeybee, the yellow jacket can sting repeatedly without dying and carries a potent venom that can cause intense pain. (OG12 Q#20)

2: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and aid sufferers of rheumatoid arthritis and asthma, according to three research studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine.(OG Verbal Edition 2 - Q#28)

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 6:04 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by priya2gupta5 » Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:21 am
But how about question # 70 in OG in which it was mentioned that adverb should always the verb.

"His studies of ice-polished rocks in his Alpine homeland, far outside the range of present-day glaciers, led Louis Agassiz in 1837 to propose the concept of an age when great ice sheets existed in areas now that are temperate."

The explanation mentioned in the OG is this is sentence is wrong because 'now' should follow the verb 'are'.

Now I am confused. Can please enlighten me more about this?
____________________________________
If you like what I write, do not hesitate to "thank"...

BTW origin of the word "thank"
- from Old English thancian;
- akin to Old English thanc gratitude

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: US
Thanked: 527 times
Followed by:227 members

by e-GMAT » Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:15 am
The two instances that you are comparing are not exactly comparable. In the previous post, we were talking about the following:verb adverb vs adverb verb

When it comes to this kind of placement, both typically imply the same meaning as long as there is no ambiguity in meaning. The ambiguity may happen if there is some other verb in the sentence and the placement of adverb is such that its no longer clear what the modifier modifies.

In OG#70, the issue is exactly that. Lets review the incorrect choice structure:

Clause A: ..when great ice sheets existed in areas now
Clause B: that are temperate.

The placement of "now" in Clause A is such that "now" describes the verb - existed. This is non-sensical. The verb "existed" describes an event that took place way back in the history. Using "now" with this verb is incorrect and illogical.

Lets consider a similar sentence: In the example below, both sentences are logical but they imply different meanings.

The mouse ran swiftly away from the cat that ran after it.
The mouse ran away from the cat that swiftly ran after it.

Thus, the key thing to remember with adverbs is that they are pretty flexible in terms of their placement, with the only caveat that there should not be any confusion about which verb this adverb refers to.

• Page 1 of 1