BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Perimeter

Expert replies
by sparkles3144 » Fri May 10, 2013 2:07 pm
A rectangle has a perimeter of 28 inches. What are the dimensions of the rectangle?

(1) The area of the rectangle is 40 inches squared.

(2) The length is 6 inches more than the width

I know how to solve this.
However, I am wondering if I can assume that l and w are integers.
It is not stated.

Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri May 10, 2013 2:20 pm
sparkles3144 wrote:A rectangle has a perimeter of 28 inches. What are the dimensions of the rectangle?

(1) The area of the rectangle is 40 inches squared.

(2) The length is 6 inches more than the width

I know how to solve this.
However, I am wondering if I can assume that l and w are integers.
It is not stated.

Thanks!
No, we cannot assume that the lengths are integers.
Here's one solution:

Target question: What are the dimensions of the rectangle?

Given: A rectangle has a perimeter of 28 inches.
Let L = length of rectangle
Let W = width of rectangle

If the perimeter is 28, then 2L + 2W = 28
We can simplify this by dividing both sides by 2 to get: L + W = 14

Statement 1: The area of the rectangle is 40 inches squared.
In other words, LW = 40

Since we already know that L + W = 14, we can solve for W to get W = 14 - L
Now take the equation LW = 40, and replace W with (14 - L) to get . . .
L(14 - L) = 40
Expand: 14L - L^2 = 40
Rearrange to get: L^2 - 14L + 40 = 0
Factor: (L - 4)(L - 10) = 0
So, L = 4 or 10

If L = 4, then W = 10, which means the dimensions are 4 by 10
If L = 10, then W = 4, which means the dimensions are still 4 by 10
In other words, the the dimensions must be 4 by 10
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: The length is 6 inches more than the width
In other words, L = W + 6

Since we already know that L + W = 14, we can solve for W to get W = 14 - L
Now take the equation L = W + 6, and replace W with (14 - L) to get . . .
L = (14 - L) + 6
Rearrange: 2L = 20
Solve: L = 10
If L = 10, then W = 4, which means the dimensions are 4 by 10
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer = D

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Fri Apr 01, 2016 10:13 am
Hello Together,

Please clarify as I believe answer should be option B not D because When solve statement 1 we get 2 values of W and L i.e when l = 10 then W = 4 and when W = 4 then l =10 since this statement does lock L and W to have one particular value I believe it is insufficient and Option B should be the right choice.

Please reply as I am in too much of a fix
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Apr 01, 2016 10:21 am
[email protected] wrote:Hello Together,

Please clarify as I believe answer should be option B not D because When solve statement 1 we get 2 values of W and L i.e when l = 10 then W = 4 and when W = 4 then l =10 since this statement does lock L and W to have one particular value I believe it is insufficient and Option B should be the right choice.

Please reply as I am in too much of a fix
Yes, we do get two different values for W (W = 4 or W = 10).
However, the target question does not ask us to determine the value of W. The target question asks us to determine the dimensions of the rectangle.
A rectangle with dimensions 4 x 10 is identical to a rectangle with dimensions 10 x 4

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Fri Apr 01, 2016 10:24 am
Thanks a lot :) . A key point I missed out and was scratching my head .. Thanks a lot for your guidance again
Join the discussion

by Gurpreet singh » Thu Jun 09, 2016 6:10 pm
Hi Brent,

In case the question stem had asked for the length instead of dimension will the statement 1 still be sufficient? since we are getting 2 values.
Thanks
Gurpreet

Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
sparkles3144 wrote:A rectangle has a perimeter of 28 inches. What are the dimensions of the rectangle?

(1) The area of the rectangle is 40 inches squared.

(2) The length is 6 inches more than the width

I know how to solve this.
However, I am wondering if I can assume that l and w are integers.
It is not stated.

Thanks!
No, we cannot assume that the lengths are integers.
Here's one solution:

Target question: What are the dimensions of the rectangle?

Given: A rectangle has a perimeter of 28 inches.
Let L = length of rectangle
Let W = width of rectangle

If the perimeter is 28, then 2L + 2W = 28
We can simplify this by dividing both sides by 2 to get: L + W = 14

Statement 1: The area of the rectangle is 40 inches squared.
In other words, LW = 40

Since we already know that L + W = 14, we can solve for W to get W = 14 - L
Now take the equation LW = 40, and replace W with (14 - L) to get . . .
L(14 - L) = 40
Expand: 14L - L^2 = 40
Rearrange to get: L^2 - 14L + 40 = 0
Factor: (L - 4)(L - 10) = 0
So, L = 4 or 10

If L = 4, then W = 10, which means the dimensions are 4 by 10
If L = 10, then W = 4, which means the dimensions are still 4 by 10
In other words, the the dimensions must be 4 by 10
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: The length is 6 inches more than the width
In other words, L = W + 6

Since we already know that L + W = 14, we can solve for W to get W = 14 - L
Now take the equation L = W + 6, and replace W with (14 - L) to get . . .
L = (14 - L) + 6
Rearrange: 2L = 20
Solve: L = 10
If L = 10, then W = 4, which means the dimensions are 4 by 10
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer = D

Cheers,
Brent
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:56 am
Gurpreet singh wrote:Hi Brent,

In case the question stem had asked for the length instead of dimension will the statement 1 still be sufficient? since we are getting 2 values.
Thanks
Gurpreet
If I remember correctly, the GMAT actually considers the length to be the longer side of the rectangle. (I learned this the hard way, doing an OG problem back in 2009 when I was studying for the test; I was quite surprised.) I had never heard this anywhere before, so I'm still skeptical, but I'm quite sure I remember an OG DS problem that turned on this.

By their logic, then, if I tell you I have a rectangle with dimensions 10 and 4, the length MUST be 10 and the width MUST be 4.
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Fri Jun 10, 2016 10:15 am
Matt@VeritasPrep wrote:
Gurpreet singh wrote:Hi Brent,

In case the question stem had asked for the length instead of dimension will the statement 1 still be sufficient? since we are getting 2 values.
Thanks
Gurpreet
If I remember correctly, the GMAT actually considers the length to be the longer side of the rectangle. (I learned this the hard way, doing an OG problem back in 2009 when I was studying for the test; I was quite surprised.) I had never heard this anywhere before, so I'm still skeptical, but I'm quite sure I remember an OG DS problem that turned on this.

By their logic, then, if I tell you I have a rectangle with dimensions 10 and 4, the length MUST be 10 and the width MUST be 4.
Now I'm intrigued - Matt, do you know which edition of the OG that question shows up in? (I'm assuming it's 10th or earlier.)
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion