BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Parent- Teacher

Expert replies
by fruti_yum » Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:32 am
Each of 20 parents chose one of five days from Monday through Friday to attend parent-teacher conferences. If more parents chose Monday than Tuesday, did at least one of the parents choose Friday?
(1) None of the five days was chosen by more than 5 parents.
(2) More parents chose Monday than Wednesday.


OA after some discussion!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by shahdevine » Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:08 pm
Just set up scenarios.

Rules: M>T

Your goal: Fill up Monday through Thursday with 20 parents while Friday has 0.

Statement 1)

Additional rule: No day is greater than 5, which means each day is equal to or less than 5.

So if monday=5, Tuesday=4, Wednesday=5, Thursday=5 -->Friday = 1 in order for total to be 20.

Sufficient. At least one parent has to choose friday for this to work.

Statement 2)

Additional rule: M>W

so if Monday=5, Tuesday=4, Wednesday=4, Thursday=5 --> Friday =2 in order for total to be 20.

Sufficient. At least one parent has to choose friday for this to work.

D
Join the discussion

hmm

by JeffB » Sun Aug 02, 2009 6:02 pm
I was thinking A.

For B

You can use a number higher than 5 and make a number of different combinations of 20.
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:30 pm
IMO A

to minimize on friday, maximize for other days.


1)In order from monday to friday

5 5 5 5 0
now On monday the number is greater than on tuesday

5 4 5 5 1, at least one parent will chose Friday

SUFFICIENT

2) 6 5 5 4 0
and
6 5 2 1 6

INSUFF
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by real2008 » Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:45 am
answer: A
Join the discussion

my ans

by vyomb » Mon Aug 03, 2009 1:59 am
my ans is A.
Join the discussion

by ahmad.kadry » Mon Aug 03, 2009 3:20 am
Hi,

We have the following facts.

- 20 parents
- 5 days to choose from (Mo, Tu, We, Th, Fr)
- Each parent will select maximum 1 day
- More people chose "Mo" than "Tu".
- No restriction on the parent/day distribution or the maximum parents per day!
- There is a possibility that some days were not chosen by any parents (since the question already asks whether Friday was selected).

Now, if i interpret statement 1, "None of the five days was chosen by more than 5 parents", then IMO it will mean that:

- More than 5 parents didn't choose any of these five days
- More than five means at least 6.
- That leaves us with a maximum of 14 parents.
- 14 Parents will choose from 5 days.
- Option 1: We can distribute 14 parents accross 4 days without including Friday and still conform to the fact that more poeple chose "Mo" than "Tu": Mo (6), Tu (5), We (2), Th (1), Fr(0)
- Option 2: We can also eliminate "Th" and add 1 more vote to "We": Mo (6), Tu (5), We (3), Th (0), Fr (0)
- Option 3: we can move that vote to Friday instead: Mo (6), Tu (5), We (1), Th (1), Fr (1)
- So, my conclusion is that statement 1 is not sufficient.

For statement 2, more people also chose Monday than Wednesday, then we will distribute 20 parents across 5 days:
- Option 1: Mo (10), Tu (5), We (3), Th (2), Fr(0) -> Friday can be ignored
- Option 2: Mo (10), Tu (5), We (3), Th (1), Fr(1) -> Friday can be selected

.. then again.. statement 2 is not sufficient.

Combining both statements will tell us that at most 14 parents will chose from 5 days and Monday will be chosen more than Tuesday and more than Wednesday separately .. not more than both of them combined. So, options 2 and 3 from statement 1 can still give us the same result.


Hence, IMO it should be E.
Join the discussion

Re: Parent- Teacher

by fruti_yum » Mon Aug 03, 2009 2:17 pm
Each of 20 parents chose one of five days from Monday through Friday to attend parent-teacher conferences. If more parents chose Monday than Tuesday, did at least one of the parents choose Friday?
(1) None of the five days was chosen by more than 5 parents.
(2) More parents chose Monday than Wednesday.


OA is A

The reason D is a mistake is because you were still considering statement 1 when working with statement 2.. you need to consider each one individually.. and judge each one on it's own merits!
Join the discussion

by yogami » Mon Aug 03, 2009 4:17 pm
Yup. This is a very common mistake made. I used to make this same one when i used condition 1 to evaluate condition 2 instead of evaluating it independently and ended up with different answers. careful!!
200 or 800. It don't matter no more.
Join the discussion