BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Hograth's engravings

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 242
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:49 am
Location: Delhi
Thanked: 6 times
by ranjeet75 » Sat May 07, 2011 6:26 am
Hogarth's engravings, which provide a vivid portrait of eighteenth-century London, [u]are of
interest to both [/u]artists and historians.

A. are of interest to both B. are interests both for C. are both interesting to
D. is of interest to both E. is interesting for both

Is "interesting for" is an incorrect idiom?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 979
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:38 amFollowed by: 12 members
Location: Hyderabad, India
Thanked: 49 times
GMAT Score:700

by bubbliiiiiiii » Sat May 07, 2011 6:32 am
ranjeet75 wrote:Hogarth's engravings, which provide a vivid portrait of eighteenth-century London, are of
interest to both artists and historians.

A. are of interest to both B. are interests both for C. are both interesting to
D. is of interest to both E. is interesting for both

Is "interesting for" is an incorrect idiom?
Regards,

Pranay
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 242
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:49 am
Location: Delhi
Thanked: 6 times

by ranjeet75 » Sat May 07, 2011 7:02 am
Yes it is right to use 'are' with plural 'engravings' but my ques is

Is "interesting for" is an incorrect idiom?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 183
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 11:29 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 7 times

by Chaitanya_1986 » Sat May 07, 2011 8:01 am
No idiom is there like "Intresting for"...Treat this is question as Subject Verb agreement and also BOTH usage only....NOT idiomatically that is correct or not.....
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 641
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:07 pmFollowed by: 45 members
Location: Madison, WI
Thanked: 162 times
GMAT Score:760

by Jim@Grockit » Sun May 08, 2011 10:33 am
I think the only place you would see INTERESTING + FOR is when the "for" is introducing its own prepositional phrase, as in It might be interesting for a while, but eventually it gets dull. The expected idiom for indicating the entities who would be interested is INTERESTING + TO.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1