BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

In 1990’s

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:13 pm
Location: Plano , Texas
Thanked: 2 times
by deepamohn » Fri Dec 05, 2008 11:32 am
In 1990’s, there are more babies born by women over thirty years old than under it.


(A) than under it
(B) than were they under it
(C) than had been under it
(D) than were the babies
(E) than those were under it


OA A
Why not [spoiler] E ? [/spoiler]
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

Re: In 1990’s

by iamcste » Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:52 pm
deepamohn wrote:In 1990’s, there are more babies born by women over thirty years old than under it.


(A) than under it
(B) than were they under it
(C) than had been under it
(D) than were the babies
(E) than those were under it


OA A
Why not [spoiler] E ? [/spoiler]


Ha haa haa...


Now check options

In, E -"those " can refer to babies as well as the women...

So does B

C-Past perfect is not reqd, constrn awkward

D-Illogical

Note: There is , are --filpped questions


Althôugh A is the OA, Pls let me source of qtn
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:13 pm
Location: Plano , Texas
Thanked: 2 times

by deepamohn » Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:38 pm
Thx. This question is from 1000SC.

https://thousandsc.blocked/2006/04/qn359.html
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pmFollowed by: 25 members
Thanked: 237 times
GMAT Score:730

Re: In 1990’s

by logitech » Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:44 pm
In 1990’s, there are more babies born by women over thirty years old than babies born by women under thirty years.


(A) than under it

I hope you can understand why (A) is correct now. By the way I think the THOSE in E clearly refers to babies, but the construction was awkward.

In 1990’s, there are more babies born by women over thirty years old than those born by women under thirty years.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:00 pm
Location: New Delhi , India
Thanked: 13 times

by ronniecoleman » Sat Dec 06, 2008 5:46 am
how badly the 1000 SC source can be... this question clearly shows...

Kudos to above people...who are still justifying the answers :D
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:13 amFollowed by: 4 members
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Thanked: 16 times
GMAT Score:650

by tisrar02 » Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:50 pm
ronniecoleman wrote:how badly the 1000 SC source can be... this question clearly shows...

Kudos to above people...who are still justifying the answers :D
..
Dedication is what leads to success...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:58 amFollowed by: 120 members
Location: New York City
Thanked: 188 times
GMAT Score:770

by Tommy Wallach » Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:52 pm
Hey All,

Just to be sure an expert has weighed in on this.

This is a ridiculous question in every way. You don't say "In 1990's," you say "In the 1990's." And if you said that, you'd need a past tense verb, if this question was written after the 1990's, or a present perfect verb, if it was written during the 1990's (or a future tense verb, if it was written BEFORE the 1990's! those years are OVER). But the present tense verb "are"? Totally crazy wrong.

Ignore this question. Run for the hills. Screaming!

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1