BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 25
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 8 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

1000 SC Q#2

Expert replies
by rajeshvellanki » Wed Apr 25, 2007 9:23 pm
2. A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.
(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

I thought answer was D but turns out that the answer is A. why?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: 1000 SC Q#2

by jayhawk2001 » Wed Apr 25, 2007 9:36 pm
rajeshvellanki wrote:2. A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.
(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

I thought answer was D but turns out that the answer is A. why?
Classic case of past perfect tense. The 1972 agreement did something
to prevent what was happening prior to 1972.

The 2 events here are in the past but to indicate relative time, you have
to use "had + verb" to denote the prior event. Hence A.

D uses "are allowed" which is in the present tense and hence incorrect.
Join the discussion

by Ashish Garg » Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:38 am
This is an OG question numbered 62. And there they r saying that D is correct?
Can someone please explain??
Actually many ques. in this 1000 SC collection are from OG.
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:39 am
Yikes, goof up in my earlier post. I had misunderstood what the sentence
was trying to say :-(. Another entry to my error log.

The action of dumping continues into the present and so the best verb to
denote this action is "are allowed".

If the municipalities had been allowed to dump x and then the
agreement reduced it to y, then would "had been" be an appropriate
verb to use?
Join the discussion

by richardwang6430 » Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:50 am
It depends on the action verb.
Join the discussion

by sukrant26 » Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:49 pm
Sorry, however the reason to use 'are allowed' is still not clear.

'Had been allowed' refers to the amount of phosphates allowed previous to the 1972 agreement. Isnt it? Or 'had been allowed' can be replaced with 'were allowed'.

Why is present tense used in the case?
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:40 am
The Act is an ongoing, living document - it doesn't apply retroactively, it's always in effect.

If we were to use the verb "had been allowed", then we'd only be speaking about what they were allowed to do in the past. By using "are allowed", we recognize that the Act continues to govern what people are allowed to do today.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by lokeshg98 » Mon Jul 06, 2009 1:22 pm
Actually the author is pointing at a past agreement which is effective in present as well. so a present tense to indicate that the muncipalities are still allowed to dump...
Join the discussion

by Mayur Sand » Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:48 pm
so whats the final verdict (A) or (D)
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:58 pm
Its D
Join the discussion

by imhimanshu » Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:39 pm
but i think, we cant infer the information whether the agreement still allows muncipalities to dump...! We need to get the info from the question only which explicitly states that "municipalities had been allowed" . then why we are opting for D. pls explain..and if we have any other examples pls share the same
Join the discussion

Re: 1000 SC Q#2

by real2008 » Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:25 am
rajeshvellanki wrote:2. A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.
(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

I thought answer was D but turns out that the answer is A. why?
I find,

choice A speaks: some amount of phosphate dumping was allowed before 1972 but then one agreement came into force to reduce the amount of phosphate dumping.

Choice D speaks:
One agreement in 1972 came into force and by that very agreement the amount of phosphate dumping was brought down and that still continues.

Choice D appears logical. Otherwise we have to address who allowed dumping before 1972 as choice A speaks about.
Last edited by real2008 on Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by turbo jet » Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:25 am
I agree with jayhawk on why A is correct.

Its a case of perfect past tense.
When there are 2 actions/events in the past, we need to find out the sequence of events.

1st event: will always take past perfect tense (Had+Past Participle) HAD BEEN ALLOWED

2nd event: Will always take simple past form of the verb REDUCED
Life is Tom; I am Jerry ;)
Join the discussion

by understudy » Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:38 pm
OA is D but this one is REALLY confusing and I just scored a V45 in my GMAT Prep with 100% accuracy in SC.

It makes complete sense to think that the amount of phosphates municipalities HAD BEEN ALLOWED to dump (i.e. before the agreement was in place) was reduced by the agreement. Prior to the agreement, they were allowed to dump X (hence, the HAD BEEN ALLOWED to dump) and after the agreement, they were allowed to dump Y.
Join the discussion

by anujtripathi2006 » Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:44 am
In my opinion A is the correct answer.
Join the discussion