1000 SC Q#2

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 1:30 pm

by gilliamwibson » Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:35 pm
anujtripathi2006 wrote:In my opinion A is the correct answer.
I gave it a thought trying to be not pissed for a moment, and I think the action that is allowed
is dumping the phosphates and it is in my opinion independent of the amount it had been restricted to or perhaps even left unregulated once.
i.e.

..reduced the amount of phosphates (that) municipalities are allowed to dump to the GL.

second case where the noun is the noun clause in whole: the amount of phosphates (that) municipalities had been allowed to dump to GL... here amount really matters

given all the above and that GMAT goes for the simplest concise and clear answer I'd say that choice D is more appropriate. It has less words with a clear meaning.

BTW my first choice was A as most of you chose.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:38 am

by anujtripathi2006 » Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:41 am
Hey, rather than writing post here & to wait for sometime to get response, we should get together to a chat room everyday to share our thoughts.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 1:30 pm

by gilliamwibson » Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:58 pm
anujtripathi2006 wrote:Hey, rather than writing post here & to wait for sometime to get response, we should get together to a chat room everyday to share our thoughts.
I agree anuj however we all live in different time-zones.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:51 am
anujtripathi2006 wrote:Hey, rather than writing post here & to wait for sometime to get response, we should get together to a chat room everyday to share our thoughts.
u already have PM option..so u can use that ...

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 am
Thanked: 137 times
Followed by:5 members

by thephoenix » Mon Apr 19, 2010 12:41 am
reopening the thread ,
in sentences like this one how one can interpret the correct sequence .
Here we are having two school of thoughts.
On test day how to handle these kind of confusing sequences....
pls help

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 305
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:38 am
Thanked: 10 times

by Shawshank » Mon Apr 19, 2010 1:34 am
IMO -- D

I belive the event is still going on .. and hence "D" would be the right choice.

MOST IMPORTANT, irrespective of the WHt 1000SC says.. it is wise to follow the OG and in OG the answer is "D"... For me the debate ends there..
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Mon Apr 19, 2010 2:15 am
i'm not technically supposed to comment on problems from 1000sc or OG (both of which are banned sources over at our home MGMAT forum), but at least i will state, for the record, that the original post contains an incorrect "OA".

1000sc is a notoriously unreliable source. trust it at your own risk.

the correct oa is noted by other posters further down the line.[/b]
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 10:12 am

by ankitgarg20 » Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:20 pm
lunarpower wrote:i'm not technically supposed to comment on problems from 1000sc or OG (both of which are banned sources over at our home MGMAT forum), but at least i will state, for the record, that the original post contains an incorrect "OA".

1000sc is a notoriously unreliable source. trust it at your own risk.

the correct oa is noted by other posters further down the line.[/b]
With due respect to Ron, I want to ask, why is OG is banned at MGMAT forum? I can understand 1000sc being unreliable, but OG is an official source for questions. I wonder why is it banned?

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:34 am

revised...

by kishore0912 » Sun Jun 12, 2011 8:19 am
A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.
(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

'D' is incorrect.

'A' is correct. The sentence talks about two actions that happened in the past.

Action 1: amount of phosphates that municipalities allowed to dump
Action 2: Reduction, through agreement, in amount of phosphates that municipalities allowed to dump

The first action in the past will contain 'had', which is action:1 in this case.

Hence, 'A' - correct answer

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:08 am

by f066011 » Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:21 am
kishore0912 wrote:A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.
(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

'D' is incorrect.

'A' is correct. The sentence talks about two actions that happened in the past.

Action 1: amount of phosphates that municipalities allowed to dump
Action 2: Reduction, through agreement, in amount of phosphates that municipalities allowed to dump

The first action in the past will contain 'had', which is action:1 in this case.

Hence, 'A' - correct answer
i do respect ur analysis kishore0912 but i think answer is D refer [ OG 12th edition Q 74 ]

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 12:42 am

by hjafferi » Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:26 am
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:The Act is an ongoing, living document - it doesn't apply retroactively, it's always in effect.

If we were to use the verb "had been allowed", then we'd only be speaking about what they were allowed to do in the past. By using "are allowed", we recognize that the Act continues to govern what people are allowed to do today.
IMO with option D as discussed above...

Though I got it right the first time as option D felt right but was unsure...