One question - As per OG explanation, the problem with A is
1) ABILITY FOR -ING : idiomatically wrong
2) To <> and To <> : parallelism not there
A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make sense of speech.
However I eliminated based on absence of "THAT" after "brisk" because it is not idiomatic.
Is this correct ?
A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk it hampers...BLAH BLAH BLAH
or
A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk THAT it hampers...BLAH BLAH BLAH
1) ABILITY FOR -ING : idiomatically wrong
2) To <> and To <> : parallelism not there
A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make sense of speech.
However I eliminated based on absence of "THAT" after "brisk" because it is not idiomatic.
Is this correct ?
A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk it hampers...BLAH BLAH BLAH
or
A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk THAT it hampers...BLAH BLAH BLAH












