Attention : OG qualifies the usage of "As a means of" based on the context . "As a means of" can be used for sure.papgust wrote:"As a means to" is the CORRECT idiom.
Incorrect Idioms:
* "As a means of"
* "As a means for"
--> [Refer OG11, Qn. # 60] <--
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Featured Course
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
Papgust's GMAT SENTENCE CORRECTION FLASHCARDS directory
Could you provide an example of this please .papgust wrote:For measurements (such as amount, quantity), use "twice" or similar kind of words for comparison. DO NOT use "double" or similar kind of words.
In general, many of us have issues when it comes to quantity or quantity related comparisons , such as twice, double, as much as , as many as, limitations, equal etc. Could someone put more stuff this with examples to real get into depth of the issue.
Thanks in advance
.
Thanks balraj thanks papgust!!ballubalraj wrote:Thanks a ton Papgust.
Guys, Here is the consolidated document with all the flashcards that Papgust has uploaded so far.
-Balraj.
papgust especially liked the concrete / abstract noun topics.... never thought of nouns in so much depth!
Last edited by arora007 on Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance
pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance
pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
So what should be the correct form of the sentence?papgust wrote:"Chances of a collision increase greatly with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites".
"continually increasing" clearly refers to "amount of space debris". But the sentence fails to indicate that the number of satellites is ALSO growing. (In essence, it should also refer to satellites).
--> [Refer Verbal Review 2nd Ed., Qn. # 31] <--
Rashmi.... a "Target GMAT Score: 800+ " ??
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance
pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance
pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Hie pap gust.papgust wrote:Pronoun WHICH:
"Which" is used as a relative pronoun ONLY to refer to the NOUN immediately preceding it.
In other words, "Which", by default, refers to the noun that is closest to the left of the comma.
WHAT TO DO if "Which" seems to refer to the action of the preceding clause??
Do one of the following,
(i) Link "which" properly to an antecedent NOUN.
(ii) Rework the sentence to avoid its use entirely.
Can u explain the same about "that " and "it".
Sorry. I'm far from the book right now. You may refer to the Verbal Review 2nd Edition Qn. #31 for the correct form of the sentence.surajgarg wrote:So what should be the correct form of the sentence?papgust wrote:"Chances of a collision increase greatly with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites".
"continually increasing" clearly refers to "amount of space debris". But the sentence fails to indicate that the number of satellites is ALSO growing. (In essence, it should also refer to satellites).
--> [Refer Verbal Review 2nd Ed., Qn. # 31] <--
Download GMAT Math and CR questions with Solutions from Instructors and High-scorers:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/download-gma ... 59366.html
-----------
GO GREEN..! GO VEG..!
Daily Quote:
"Stop feeling sorry for the Butcher if you had to go Veg. The butcher can find another job but the poor animal cannot get back its life"
https://www.beatthegmat.com/download-gma ... 59366.html
-----------
GO GREEN..! GO VEG..!
Daily Quote:
"Stop feeling sorry for the Butcher if you had to go Veg. The butcher can find another job but the poor animal cannot get back its life"
shekhar.kataria wrote:Hie pap gust.papgust wrote:Pronoun WHICH:
"Which" is used as a relative pronoun ONLY to refer to the NOUN immediately preceding it.
In other words, "Which", by default, refers to the noun that is closest to the left of the comma.
WHAT TO DO if "Which" seems to refer to the action of the preceding clause??
Do one of the following,
(i) Link "which" properly to an antecedent NOUN.
(ii) Rework the sentence to avoid its use entirely.
Can u explain the same about "that " and "it".
I have PMed Ron (GMAT Instructor) to answer your query. Sorry for the delay in responding.
Download GMAT Math and CR questions with Solutions from Instructors and High-scorers:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/download-gma ... 59366.html
-----------
GO GREEN..! GO VEG..!
Daily Quote:
"Stop feeling sorry for the Butcher if you had to go Veg. The butcher can find another job but the poor animal cannot get back its life"
https://www.beatthegmat.com/download-gma ... 59366.html
-----------
GO GREEN..! GO VEG..!
Daily Quote:
"Stop feeling sorry for the Butcher if you had to go Veg. The butcher can find another job but the poor animal cannot get back its life"
the short answer:papgust wrote:shekhar.kataria wrote:Hie pap gust.papgust wrote:Pronoun WHICH:
"Which" is used as a relative pronoun ONLY to refer to the NOUN immediately preceding it.
In other words, "Which", by default, refers to the noun that is closest to the left of the comma.
WHAT TO DO if "Which" seems to refer to the action of the preceding clause??
Do one of the following,
(i) Link "which" properly to an antecedent NOUN.
(ii) Rework the sentence to avoid its use entirely.
Can u explain the same about "that " and "it".
I have PMed Ron (GMAT Instructor) to answer your query. Sorry for the delay in responding.
if "that" or "it" seems to refer to the action of the preceding clause, then it's wrong!
the above is really all you have to know -- i think all this emphasis on how to fix the sentences is wrongheaded, since you won't actually be called upon to fix the sentences. as long as you are aware of the fact that pronouns are not allowed to stand for anything other than nouns*, that's all the knowledge you really need.
sentence correction is already extremely complicated; it's not a good idea to complicate the issue even further by worrying about how to fix errors. as long as you can identify what is an error and what is not an error, you are good to go.
--
*for the one exception to this rule that will actually show up on the test, see the following post:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/og-12-52-t53380.html#263671
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
ballubalraj
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 66
- Location: Bangalore
- Thanked: 9 times
- GMAT Score:730
papgust wrote:Relative Pronouns:
Such pronouns refer to something already mentioned in the sentence.
"Who", "Whom" --> People
"Which" --> Things
"That" --> People/Things
"Whose" --> Who or What something belongs to
As per MGMAT SC book, 'THAT' can not refer to people. I myself have not seen a single correct answer in which THAT refers to people.
Any insight on this?
correct.ballubalraj wrote:papgust wrote:Relative Pronouns:
Such pronouns refer to something already mentioned in the sentence.
"Who", "Whom" --> People
"Which" --> Things
"That" --> People/Things
"Whose" --> Who or What something belongs to
As per MGMAT SC book, 'THAT' can not refer to people. I myself have not seen a single correct answer in which THAT refers to people.
Any insight on this?
for people, you must use "who/whom", not "that" or "which".
--
however, note that "whose" can be used for either people or things, since "whose" is also the possessive form of "which"/"that".
for instance:
the person that i saw yesterday --> wrong
the person whom i saw yesterday --> correct
the person whose son i taught last year --> correct
the table that i bought yesterday --> correct
the table whom i bought yesterday --> wrong
the table whose legs i replaced yesterday --> correct
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
ballubalraj
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 66
- Location: Bangalore
- Thanked: 9 times
- GMAT Score:730
Hi All
Can't we have all of the baove as a document . it would really help.
Thanks for the notes
Aniriddha
Can't we have all of the baove as a document . it would really help.
Thanks for the notes
Aniriddha
