BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

paper recycling (Knewton CR)

Expert replies
by bvn » Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:03 am
If the United States continues to waste paper at current levels, the nation's unprotected forests will soon be destroyed and trees in nature preserves will have to be cut down in order to create more paper. Charging every household a fee for each pound of paper it does not recycle will induce Americans to reduce the amount of paper they do not recycle; this charge will therefore protect the trees in nature preserves.

Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion that the proposed fee will have its intended effect?


(A) Americans will reduce the amount of paper they do not recycle by reducing the amount of paper products they buy.

(B) The collection fee will not significantly effect the purchasing power of most Americans, even if their households do not recycle.

(C) The fee is substantial enough to effectively deter Americans from not recycling.

(D) The preservation of trees in nature preserves is an important issue for most Americans.

(E) Trees outside the U.S. could be cut down to satisfy Americans' demand for paper.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by jaxis » Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:58 am
IT should be C
Join the discussion

by missionGMAT007 » Sun Dec 05, 2010 8:43 am
one more for C
Join the discussion

by pm.mba11 » Sun Dec 05, 2010 8:55 am
IMO, the assumption is that people should use less paper that cannot be recycled. So, choice A should be given preference over choice C.

IMO A
Last edited by pm.mba11 on Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by Deepthi Subbu » Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:00 am
I go with A
Join the discussion

by prac » Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:14 pm
is it C
Join the discussion

by kt00381n » Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:52 pm
one more for C, whats the OA
Join the discussion

by bvn » Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:17 pm
OA is C.

here is from Knewton:


Unprotected forests will be destroyed and trees in nature preserves will have to be cut down if current levels of paper waste continue. Charging fees per pound of paper not recycled will inhibit further paper waste and protect trees in nature preserves.

The question asks for the assumption of the argument. The author concludes that charging every household a fee for each pound of paper it does not recycle will encourage Americans to recycle. This will, in turn, protect the trees in nature preserves.

The author assumes that Americans will comply with the new fee, and thus waste less paper and save the trees in the preserve. The answer must touch on this assumption.

Choice A states that Americans will lower the amount of paper they do not recycle by purchasing fewer paper products. No mention is made of a change in buying habits in the argument.
Join the discussion