BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

pamela and quincy

Expert replies
by daretodream » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:13 pm
Pamela: Physicians training for a medical specialty serve as resident staff physicians in hospitals. They work such long hours-up to 36 consecutive hours-that fatigue impairs their ability to make the best medical decisions during the final portion of their shifts.

Quincy: Thousands of physicians now practicing have been trained according to the same regimen, and records show they generally made good medical decisions during their training periods. Why should what has worked in the past be changed now?

Which one of the following, if true, is the most effective counter Pamela might make to Quincy's argument?

(A) The basic responsibilities of resident staff physicians in hospitals have not changed substantially over the past few decades.
(B) Because medical reimbursement policies now pay for less recuperation time in hospitals, patients in hospitals are, on the average, more seriously ill during their stay than in the past.
(C) It is important that emergency-room patients receive continuity of physician care, insofar as possible, over the critical period after admission, generally 24 hours.
(D) The load of work on resident physicians-in-training varies according to the medical specialty for which each is being trained.
(E) The training of physicians should include observation and recognition of the signs indicating a hospitalized patient's progress or decline over a period of at least 36 hours
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by komal » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:34 pm
daretodream wrote:Pamela: Physicians training for a medical specialty serve as resident staff physicians in hospitals. They work such long hours-up to 36 consecutive hours-that fatigue impairs their ability to make the best medical decisions during the final portion of their shifts.

Quincy: Thousands of physicians now practicing have been trained according to the same regimen, and records show they generally made good medical decisions during their training periods. Why should what has worked in the past be changed now?

Which one of the following, if true, is the most effective counter Pamela might make to Quincy's argument?

(A) The basic responsibilities of resident staff physicians in hospitals have not changed substantially over the past few decades.
Incorrect : It does not talk about changes that necessary now

(B) Because medical reimbursement policies now pay for less recuperation time in hospitals, patients in hospitals are, on the average, more seriously ill during their stay than in the past.
Correct : This provides a reason when it becomes necessary to make best medical decisions since patients in hospitals are, on average, more seriously ill.

(C) It is important that emergency-room patients receive continuity of physician care, insofar as possible, over the critical period after admission, generally 24 hours.
Incorrect : Clearly out of scope

(D) The load of work on resident physicians-in-training varies according to the medical specialty for which each is being trained.
Incorrect : It does not answer the quincy's question 'Why should what has worked in the past be changed now?'

(E) The training of physicians should include observation and recognition of the signs indicating a hospitalized patient's progress or decline over a period of at least 36 hours
Incorrect : Irrelevant.
Last edited by komal on Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:48 am
(A) The basic responsibilities of resident staff physicians in hospitals have not changed substantially over the past few decades -->no impact

(B) Because medical reimbursement policies now pay for less recuperation time in hospitals, patients in hospitals are, on the average, more seriously ill during their stay than in the past -->HOLD IT

(C) It is important that emergency-room patients receive continuity of physician care, insofar as possible, over the critical period after admission, generally 24 hours
-->seems attractive, however, physicians here can be official physicians, not only trained physicians, therefore it's not a strong weaken. Besides, trained physicians can't only make the best medical decision at the final portion of 36hours, while here is only 24hours emergency patients need care of physicians, so wrong

(D) The load of work on resident physicians-in-training varies according to the medical specialty for which each is being trained
--> irrelevant

(E) The training of physicians should include observation and recognition of the signs indicating a hospitalized patient's progress or decline over a period of at least 36 hours
-->HOLD IT

NOW B/N b and e
i will go for B
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:59 am
I think that if D is true, there may well be some specialities in which the trainees experience greater than average levels of fatigue and thus make more mistakes than the population of trainees. I am always suspicious of arguments based on what is generally true or on overall statistics. If 98% of the first-grade students in a given state have passed an achievement test, is it logical to conclude that all 5th grade teachers are competent? I would choose D
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion