BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

p is a positive odd integer,

Expert replies
by ska7945 » Fri Oct 03, 2008 7:39 pm
If p is a positive odd integer, what is the remainder when p is divided by 4 ?

(1) When p is divided by 8, the remainder is 5.

(2) p is the sum of the squares of two positive integers.
let's beat GMAT.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by raju232007 » Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:22 pm
the first statement tells that when p is divided by 8,the remainder is 5...

so p must be 8n+5 (where n=0,1,2,3,4..etc)
p= 5,21,29,37.....etc
Now when p is divided by 4 a remainder of 1 is obtained...

therefore statement 1 is sufficient..

Statement 2 tells that p is the sum of squares of two positive integers..

p=1^2+2^2=5...5/4==remainder:1
p=3^2+5^2=34...34/4==remainder:2

But remember it is given in the question that p is a positive odd integer so the second case should not be considered....

Statement 2 is also sufficient...

Hence the ans is D...
Let me know if you still have any doubts..
Join the discussion

by sethids » Sat Oct 04, 2008 3:36 pm
raju232007 wrote:the first statement tells that when p is divided by 8,the remainder is 5...

so p must be 8n+5 (where n=0,1,2,3,4..etc)
p= 5,21,29,37.....etc
Now when p is divided by 4 a remainder of 1 is obtained...

therefore statement 1 is sufficient..

Statement 2 tells that p is the sum of squares of two positive integers..

p=1^2+2^2=5...5/4==remainder:1
p=3^2+5^2=34...34/4==remainder:2

But remember it is given in the question that p is a positive odd integer so the second case should not be considered....

Statement 2 is also sufficient...

Hence the ans is D...
Let me know if you still have any doubts..
I agree with your answer but its not that the second case is not to be considered. The second case you have mentioned needs some modification.
The question says that p is a positive odd number. According to statement 2 we cannot rule out p being the sum of even and odd squares.
However each such sum when divided by 4 yields a remainder of 1.
e.g. p could be 100 + 81 = 181, 4 + 9 = 13, 36 + 49 = 85 ...
Join the discussion

by raju232007 » Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:17 pm
You have considered the squares of consecutive integers...
9^2+10^2=181............181/4..remainder=1
2^2+3^2=13................13/4..remainder=1
6^2+7^2=85.................85/4..remainder=1

But as i have already pointed out in my previous post the condition in the question is that p should be odd...so you should never consider the the case of sum of two numbers which results in an even number...

In other words...you should never consider the sum of squares of two consecutive odd integers which results in a even number

1^2+3^2=10........10/4..remainder=2
3^2+5^2=34........34/4..remainder=2
5^2+7^2=74........74/4..remainder=2

So all the above cases should be neglected as the condition in the question states that p should be an odd integer...
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Sun Oct 05, 2008 12:19 am
I agree with D

I had another approach to (1) because i hate to pick numbers

Q: p=4q+R, R=?

(1)
p=8q+5
p>0, so min value of p is 5
8q is divisible by 4 with R=0
5 is divisible by 4 with R=1
so R is always =1
SUFF

(2)
I used mentioned above approach
SUFF

D

What do you think about my approach to (1)?
Join the discussion

by raju232007 » Sun Oct 05, 2008 1:56 am
yeah...even the above mentioned method works perfectly fine..and its much quicker than assuming numbers
Join the discussion

by kris610 » Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:56 pm
4meonly wrote:I agree with D

I had another approach to (1) because i hate to pick numbers

Q: p=4q+R, R=?

(1)
p=8q+5
p>0, so min value of p is 5
8q is divisible by 4 with R=0
5 is divisible by 4 with R=1
so R is always =1
SUFF

(2)
I used mentioned above approach
SUFF

D

I agree with your approach to 1.

But for 2) picking numbers to confirm may be a better idea.

9 + 16 = 25 remainder is 1

9 + 25 = 34 remainder is 2

What do you think about my approach to (1)?
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:42 pm
I think you arfe asking about your approach to (2) because you agree with those of (1)

p is a positive odd integer (main stem) so this e.g. is correct
9 + 16 = 25 remainder is 1

but this is not
9 + 25 = 34 remainder is 2
because 34 is even. we need odd p

HTH
Join the discussion

by fleurdelisse » Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:49 am
How can you more generally prove that (2) is sufficient??
You can't go and sum all possible squares that yield to something odd, what if there is some pair of squares that yield to a remainder of 3?? How do we prove that the remainer can only be 1 and not 3??
Please help.
Thanks.
Join the discussion

Re: p is a positive odd integer,

by Ian Stewart » Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:23 pm
ska7945 wrote:If p is a positive odd integer, what is the remainder when p is divided by 4 ?

(2) p is the sum of the squares of two positive integers.
If you want an algebraic proof, using Statement 2 alone:

p = x^2 + y^2, where x and y are integers. Since p is odd, one of the squares must be even, one odd - let's say x is even, y is odd. Then x = 2k for some integer k, and y = 2m + 1, for some integer m. So,

p = x^2 + y^2
p = (2k)^2 + (2m + 1)^2
p = 4k^2 + 4m^2 + 4m + 1
p = 4(k^2 + m^2 + m) + 1

So p is 1 more than a multiple of 4, and the remainder will be 1 when p is divided by 4. Sufficient.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by fleurdelisse » Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:05 am
Great! Thanks a lot!
Join the discussion