BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat prep question

Expert replies
by yvonne12 » Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:26 pm
During an experiment, some water was removed from each of 6 water tanks. If the standard deviation of the volumes of water in the tanks at the beginning of the experiment was 10 gallons, what was the standard deviation of the volume of water in the tanks at the end of the experiment?

I. For each, 30 percent of the volume of water that was in the tank at the beginning of the experiment was removed during the experiment.

II. The average volume of the water in the tanks at the end of the experiment was 63 gallons

can someone explain this to me please!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by jayhawk2001 » Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:19 pm
Is the answer A ?

Let a, b, c, d, e and f be the volume of water in the 6 tanks.
Let x be the average

Std dev = 10 implies
sqrt ([ (a-x)^2 + (b-x)^2 + ... + (f-x)^2] / 6) = 10

1 - sufficient. Knowing that 30% was removed from each tank tells
us that a becomes 0.7a, b becomes 0.7b etc. At the same time
x, the average becomes 0.7x

So, new standard deviation is
sqrt ([ (0.7a-0.7x)^2 + (0.7b-0.7x)^2 + ... + (0.7f-0.7x)^2] / 6)
which is 0.7 * old standard deviation

2 - insufficient. Knowing the average after the removal doesn't give
us any relationship between x and a, b, c, d, e, f.
Join the discussion

right it is A

by yvonne12 » Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:11 pm
thanks, I guess I dont have a thorough understanding of this topic. Im going to study it.
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:31 pm
Join the discussion

by logitech » Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:02 pm
aj5105 wrote:Lecture on Mean, Variance & SD

https://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 0168799472
EVERYBODY SHOULD WATCH THIS!

Thanks Aj5105!
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by welcome » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:27 am
Very good link, Thanks aj5105.
Shubham.
590 >> 630 >> 640 >> 610 >> 600 >> 640 >> 590 >> 640 >> 590 >> 590
Join the discussion

by California4jx » Sun May 17, 2009 11:46 am
aj5105 wrote:Lecture on Mean, Variance & SD

https://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 0168799472
very good explanation in that link -- thanks aj !
Join the discussion

by abcdefg » Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:42 pm
so to summarize, the standard deviation will not change if:
1) You add or subtract a constant to each term
2) Increase or decrease each term in a set of terms by the same percentage

correct?
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:55 pm
Here's why... if you multiply everything by a constant .7 (which decreases all terms by 30%), you end up calculating

((.7*a1-.7*u)^2 + (.7*a2-.7*u)^2 + ... + (.7*a6-.7*u)^2)/6

which can be expressed in terms of the original standard deviation.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by real2008 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:58 pm
Domnu wrote:Here's why... if you multiply everything by a constant .7 (which decreases all terms by 30%), you end up calculating

((.7*a1-.7*u)^2 + (.7*a2-.7*u)^2 + ... + (.7*a6-.7*u)^2)/6

which can be expressed in terms of the original standard deviation.
so i suppose D is the answer!
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:03 pm
real2008 wrote:
Domnu wrote:Here's why... if you multiply everything by a constant .7 (which decreases all terms by 30%), you end up calculating

((.7*a1-.7*u)^2 + (.7*a2-.7*u)^2 + ... + (.7*a6-.7*u)^2)/6

which can be expressed in terms of the original standard deviation.
so i suppose D is the answer!
Actually, the answer should be A. The fact that the average at the end of the experiment was 63 doesn't change anything.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by real2008 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:12 pm
Domnu wrote:
real2008 wrote:
Domnu wrote:Here's why... if you multiply everything by a constant .7 (which decreases all terms by 30%), you end up calculating

((.7*a1-.7*u)^2 + (.7*a2-.7*u)^2 + ... + (.7*a6-.7*u)^2)/6

which can be expressed in terms of the original standard deviation.
so i suppose D is the answer!
Actually, the answer should be A. The fact that the average at the end of the experiment was 63 doesn't change anything.
I got it. Thank you.
Join the discussion