gmat prep question

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 4:13 pm

gmat prep question

by yvonne12 » Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:26 pm
During an experiment, some water was removed from each of 6 water tanks. If the standard deviation of the volumes of water in the tanks at the beginning of the experiment was 10 gallons, what was the standard deviation of the volume of water in the tanks at the end of the experiment?

I. For each, 30 percent of the volume of water that was in the tank at the beginning of the experiment was removed during the experiment.

II. The average volume of the water in the tanks at the end of the experiment was 63 gallons

can someone explain this to me please!!
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:51 pm
Location: Silicon valley, California
Thanked: 30 times
Followed by:1 members

by jayhawk2001 » Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:19 pm
Is the answer A ?

Let a, b, c, d, e and f be the volume of water in the 6 tanks.
Let x be the average

Std dev = 10 implies
sqrt ([ (a-x)^2 + (b-x)^2 + ... + (f-x)^2] / 6) = 10

1 - sufficient. Knowing that 30% was removed from each tank tells
us that a becomes 0.7a, b becomes 0.7b etc. At the same time
x, the average becomes 0.7x

So, new standard deviation is
sqrt ([ (0.7a-0.7x)^2 + (0.7b-0.7x)^2 + ... + (0.7f-0.7x)^2] / 6)
which is 0.7 * old standard deviation

2 - insufficient. Knowing the average after the removal doesn't give
us any relationship between x and a, b, c, d, e, f.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 4:13 pm

right it is A

by yvonne12 » Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:11 pm
thanks, I guess I dont have a thorough understanding of this topic. Im going to study it.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:34 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by aj5105 » Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:31 pm

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

by logitech » Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:02 pm
aj5105 wrote:Lecture on Mean, Variance & SD

https://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 0168799472
EVERYBODY SHOULD WATCH THIS!

Thanks Aj5105!
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:27 am
Thanked: 7 times

by welcome » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:27 am
Very good link, Thanks aj5105.
Shubham.
590 >> 630 >> 640 >> 610 >> 600 >> 640 >> 590 >> 640 >> 590 >> 590

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:43 am
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:650

by California4jx » Sun May 17, 2009 11:46 am
aj5105 wrote:Lecture on Mean, Variance & SD

https://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 0168799472
very good explanation in that link -- thanks aj !

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:11 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by abcdefg » Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:42 pm
so to summarize, the standard deviation will not change if:
1) You add or subtract a constant to each term
2) Increase or decrease each term in a set of terms by the same percentage

correct?

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:55 pm
Thanked: 11 times
GMAT Score:740

by Domnu » Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:55 pm
Here's why... if you multiply everything by a constant .7 (which decreases all terms by 30%), you end up calculating

((.7*a1-.7*u)^2 + (.7*a2-.7*u)^2 + ... + (.7*a6-.7*u)^2)/6

which can be expressed in terms of the original standard deviation.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T

Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:06 am
Thanked: 7 times

by real2008 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:58 pm
Domnu wrote:Here's why... if you multiply everything by a constant .7 (which decreases all terms by 30%), you end up calculating

((.7*a1-.7*u)^2 + (.7*a2-.7*u)^2 + ... + (.7*a6-.7*u)^2)/6

which can be expressed in terms of the original standard deviation.
so i suppose D is the answer!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:55 pm
Thanked: 11 times
GMAT Score:740

by Domnu » Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:03 pm
real2008 wrote:
Domnu wrote:Here's why... if you multiply everything by a constant .7 (which decreases all terms by 30%), you end up calculating

((.7*a1-.7*u)^2 + (.7*a2-.7*u)^2 + ... + (.7*a6-.7*u)^2)/6

which can be expressed in terms of the original standard deviation.
so i suppose D is the answer!
Actually, the answer should be A. The fact that the average at the end of the experiment was 63 doesn't change anything.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T

Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:06 am
Thanked: 7 times

by real2008 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:12 pm
Domnu wrote:
real2008 wrote:
Domnu wrote:Here's why... if you multiply everything by a constant .7 (which decreases all terms by 30%), you end up calculating

((.7*a1-.7*u)^2 + (.7*a2-.7*u)^2 + ... + (.7*a6-.7*u)^2)/6

which can be expressed in terms of the original standard deviation.
so i suppose D is the answer!
Actually, the answer should be A. The fact that the average at the end of the experiment was 63 doesn't change anything.
I got it. Thank you.