BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat prep question

Expert replies
by yvonne12 » Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:26 pm
During an experiment, some water was removed from each of 6 water tanks. If the standard deviation of the volumes of water in the tanks at the beginning of the experiment was 10 gallons, what was the standard deviation of the volume of water in the tanks at the end of the experiment?

I. For each, 30 percent of the volume of water that was in the tank at the beginning of the experiment was removed during the experiment.

II. The average volume of the water in the tanks at the end of the experiment was 63 gallons

can someone explain this to me please!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by jayhawk2001 » Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:19 pm
Is the answer A ?

Let a, b, c, d, e and f be the volume of water in the 6 tanks.
Let x be the average

Std dev = 10 implies
sqrt ([ (a-x)^2 + (b-x)^2 + ... + (f-x)^2] / 6) = 10

1 - sufficient. Knowing that 30% was removed from each tank tells
us that a becomes 0.7a, b becomes 0.7b etc. At the same time
x, the average becomes 0.7x

So, new standard deviation is
sqrt ([ (0.7a-0.7x)^2 + (0.7b-0.7x)^2 + ... + (0.7f-0.7x)^2] / 6)
which is 0.7 * old standard deviation

2 - insufficient. Knowing the average after the removal doesn't give
us any relationship between x and a, b, c, d, e, f.
Join the discussion

right it is A

by yvonne12 » Wed Apr 11, 2007 4:11 pm
thanks, I guess I dont have a thorough understanding of this topic. Im going to study it.
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:31 pm
Join the discussion

by logitech » Mon Jan 12, 2009 11:02 pm
aj5105 wrote:Lecture on Mean, Variance & SD

https://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 0168799472
EVERYBODY SHOULD WATCH THIS!

Thanks Aj5105!
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by welcome » Tue Jan 13, 2009 8:27 am
Very good link, Thanks aj5105.
Shubham.
590 >> 630 >> 640 >> 610 >> 600 >> 640 >> 590 >> 640 >> 590 >> 590
Join the discussion

by California4jx » Sun May 17, 2009 11:46 am
aj5105 wrote:Lecture on Mean, Variance & SD

https://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 0168799472
very good explanation in that link -- thanks aj !
Join the discussion

by abcdefg » Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:42 pm
so to summarize, the standard deviation will not change if:
1) You add or subtract a constant to each term
2) Increase or decrease each term in a set of terms by the same percentage

correct?
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:55 pm
Here's why... if you multiply everything by a constant .7 (which decreases all terms by 30%), you end up calculating

((.7*a1-.7*u)^2 + (.7*a2-.7*u)^2 + ... + (.7*a6-.7*u)^2)/6

which can be expressed in terms of the original standard deviation.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by real2008 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:58 pm
Domnu wrote:Here's why... if you multiply everything by a constant .7 (which decreases all terms by 30%), you end up calculating

((.7*a1-.7*u)^2 + (.7*a2-.7*u)^2 + ... + (.7*a6-.7*u)^2)/6

which can be expressed in terms of the original standard deviation.
so i suppose D is the answer!
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:03 pm
real2008 wrote:
Domnu wrote:Here's why... if you multiply everything by a constant .7 (which decreases all terms by 30%), you end up calculating

((.7*a1-.7*u)^2 + (.7*a2-.7*u)^2 + ... + (.7*a6-.7*u)^2)/6

which can be expressed in terms of the original standard deviation.
so i suppose D is the answer!
Actually, the answer should be A. The fact that the average at the end of the experiment was 63 doesn't change anything.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by real2008 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:12 pm
Domnu wrote:
real2008 wrote:
Domnu wrote:Here's why... if you multiply everything by a constant .7 (which decreases all terms by 30%), you end up calculating

((.7*a1-.7*u)^2 + (.7*a2-.7*u)^2 + ... + (.7*a6-.7*u)^2)/6

which can be expressed in terms of the original standard deviation.
so i suppose D is the answer!
Actually, the answer should be A. The fact that the average at the end of the experiment was 63 doesn't change anything.
I got it. Thank you.
Join the discussion