BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

p > 1/3?

Expert replies
by ttd » Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:14 pm
If 2 different members are to be selected at random from a
group of 8 people and if p is the probability that both
members selected will be older than 35 years old, is
p > 1/3 ?

(1) More than half of the group members are older than
35 years old.
(2) The probability that both members selected will be 35
years old or younger is greater than 1/10 .
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ajith » Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:22 pm
ttd wrote:If 2 different members are to be selected at random from a
group of 8 people and if p is the probability that both
members selected will be older than 35 years old, is
p > 1/3 ?

(1) More than half of the group members are older than
35 years old.
(2) The probability that both members selected will be 35
years old or younger is greater than 1/10 .
1. There are at least 5 men older than 35 in the group, so the least probability of picking two people older than 35 years is 5C2/8C2 = 10/28 = 2/7; if there were 6 men older than 35 in the group, the probability of picking two people older than 35 is 15/28 which is more than 1/3 - Insufficient

2. if there were only 2 people who are less than 35 years old, probability of picking them both = 1/28 which is less than 1/10; if there were 3 people who are less than 35 years old, probability of picking 2 of them = 3/28 which is greater than 1/10. So this condition says there are at least 3 members of each kind.

Now this is a sufficient condition because, the probability of picking two 35 years olds in this case would be always less than 1/3. Sufficient
[spoiler]
So B[/spoiler]
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by liferocks » Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:31 pm
Hey,
I am getting the answerlike this

Form 1st point,
minimum number of people older than 35yr is 5 so p=10/28 which is >1/3 [30/84 vs 28/84] hence for all possible value it will be greater than 1/3-->point 1 is sufficient

From 2nd point,
minimum number of people less than or equal to 35yr is 3,this can be split like this
>35yr <=35yr p
5 3 >1/3
4 4 <1/3
3 5 <1/3
2 6 <1/3
1 7 <1/3
0 8 <1/3
-->point 2 is not sufficient.

So only point 1 is sufficient ie Ans is A
ttd, can you please confirm wat is correct. or somebody please point what I am doing wrong.
Join the discussion

by ajith » Wed Mar 31, 2010 10:34 pm
ajith wrote:
ttd wrote:If 2 different members are to be selected at random from a
group of 8 people and if p is the probability that both
members selected will be older than 35 years old, is
p > 1/3 ?

(1) More than half of the group members are older than
35 years old.
(2) The probability that both members selected will be 35
years old or younger is greater than 1/10 .
1. There are at least 5 men older than 35 in the group, so the least probability of picking two people older than 35 years is 5C2/8C2 = 10/28 = 2/7; if there were 6 men older than 35 in the group, the probability of picking two people older than 35 is 15/28 which is more than 1/3 - Insufficient

2. if there were only 2 people who are less than 35 years old, probability of picking them both = 1/28 which is less than 1/10; if there were 3 people who are less than 35 years old, probability of picking 2 of them = 3/28 which is greater than 1/10. So this condition says there are at least 3 members of each kind.

Now this is a sufficient condition because, the probability of picking two 35 years olds in this case would be always less than 1/3. Sufficient
[spoiler]
So B[/spoiler]
I did a wrong calculation 10/28 is not equal to 2/7
Which makes A sufficient and B insufficient

A is the answer
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by ttd » Thu Apr 01, 2010 1:10 pm
Thanks for your input guys.
Now, here's what the book said (which makes more sense now that today's a new day ~).
I didn't understand why B wasn't sufficient at the time of posting.
___________
Answer given was "A".

n = number of members 35+

p of both members 35+ = n / 8 x (n-1) / 7

(1) Minimum number of 35+ = 5.
Thus p = 5/8 x 4/7 = 5/14.
Sufficient

(2) n = 5 is pretty much the minimum number for p to be > 3.
In second statement, if n = 5, p of 35 younger > 1/10. p of 35 older > 1/3.
But if n becomes less than 5, p of 35 younger is still > 1/10, but p of 35 older is not > 1/3.
So insufficient
Join the discussion

by student22 » Thu Apr 01, 2010 2:29 pm
Statement 2 is saying that the probability of them NOT being 35 or older is at least 1/10...which means that it's possible that the probability is 1.0, or that 0/8 are older than 35. So p could be < 1/3. Not sufficient.
Join the discussion