BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Because natural gas is composed mostly of methane

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 468
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:20 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:4 members

Because natural gas is composed mostly of methane

by vipulgoyal » Sun Apr 05, 2015 6:40 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Because natural gas is composed mostly of methane, a simple hydrocarbon, vehicles powered by natural gas emit less of certain pollutants than the burning
of gasoline or diesel fuel.

(A) less of certain pollutants than the burning of gasoline or diesel fuel
(B) fewer of certain pollutants than burning gasoline or diesel fuel do
(C) less of certain pollutants than gasoline or diesel fuel
(D) fewer of certain pollutants than does burning gasoline or diesel fuel
(E) less of certain pollutants than those burning gasoline or diesel fuel

OA E

first "certain pollutants" seems countable , second it seems plural , shouldnt fewer be used in right ans ??
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2015 3:47 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:2 members

by bonetlobo » Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:08 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

I feel "less" and "fewer" are completely different here and would have different meanings.

Let us say pollutants emitted are A, B and C.

less of certain pollutants: A, B and C are emitted, but the "quantity" of A, B and C would be less.

fewer pollutants: Not all the three (A, B and C) will be emitted. Perhaps only A and B will be emitted.

Since the original sentence says "less of certain pollutants", changing it to "fewer" would change the meaning.

This is my understanding. Let's see what experts have to say. Is it an official question? If yes, can you also post the official explanation?
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 468
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:20 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:4 members

by vipulgoyal » Tue Apr 07, 2015 8:08 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

bonetlobo appreciate the tough analysis by you , please follow the link
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... t4057.html

but lets wait for experts call
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2015 3:47 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:2 members

by bonetlobo » Tue Apr 07, 2015 11:26 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Hello Vipul, I went through the thread, and the response of a Manhattan GMAT staff seems to be in line with what I explained above. To quote the staff:

* fewer of those pollutants and less of those pollutants have different meanings.
the former means that, if you made lists of the pollutants from each of the two sources, then one of the lists would be missing pollutants that were on the other list.
the latter means that both lists would contain the same pollutants, but that the quantities would be lower on one side.
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Apr 08, 2015 1:08 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

FEWER of the pollutants = A SMALLER NUMBER of the different types of pollutants.
For example:
Of the 1000 types of pollutants, only 10 types are emitted.

LESS of the pollutants = A SMALLER AMOUNT of each type of pollutant.
For example:
Of each type of pollutant, only 10cm³ is emitted.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 468
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:20 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:4 members

by vipulgoyal » Wed Apr 08, 2015 5:18 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

yes, as little brother and few of brothers both are correct but in different context
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 712
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:5 members

by Mo2men » Sun Jan 06, 2019 7:58 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

GMATGuruNY wrote:FEWER of the pollutants = A SMALLER NUMBER of the different types of pollutants.
For example:
Of the 1000 types of pollutants, only 10 types are emitted.

LESS of the pollutants = A SMALLER AMOUNT of each type of pollutant.
For example:
Of each type of pollutant, only 10cm³ is emitted.
Dear GMATGuruNY,

Is the OA: E clear? or does it need verb 'do'? is understood from the context.
My proposed choice:
(E) less of certain pollutants than do those burning gasoline or diesel fuel

Thanks in advance for your help
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:27 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Mo2men wrote:Dear GMATGuruNY,

Is the OA: E clear? or does it need verb 'do'? is understood from the context.
My proposed choice:
(E) less of certain pollutants than do those burning gasoline or diesel fuel

Thanks in advance for your help
Both of the following are viable:
Vehicles powered by natural gas emit less of certain pollutants than those burning gasoline or diesel fuel.
Vehicles powered by ndatural gas emit less of certain pollutants than do those burning gasoline or diesel fuel.
The inclusion of do is optional.
With or without do, the intended comparison is clear:
Vehicles powered by natural gas emit less of certain pollutants than those burning gasoline or diesel fuel [emit certain pollutants].

No verb is required in the second clause as long as the intended comparison is crystal clear.
Correct:
John ate more pizza than Mary.
Here, only interpretation is possible:
John ate more pizza than Mary ate.
Since the intended comparison is crystal clear, a verb is not required in the second clause.

Not viable:
Russia exports more oil to Europe than the United States.
Here, the intended comparison is NOT crystal clear.
Two possible meanings:
Case 1: Russia exports more oil to Europe than IT EXPORTS OIL TO THE UNITED STATES.
Case 2: Russia exports more oil to Europe than THE UNITED STATES EXPORTS OIL TO EUROPE.
If Case 2 is intended, a verb is required in the second clause to make the intended comparison crystal clear.
Correct:
China exports more oil to Europe than DOES the United States.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 712
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:5 members

by Mo2men » Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:29 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

GMATGuruNY wrote:
Mo2men wrote:Dear GMATGuruNY,

Is the OA: E clear? or does it need verb 'do'? is understood from the context.
My proposed choice:
(E) less of certain pollutants than do those burning gasoline or diesel fuel

Thanks in advance for your help
Both of the following are viable:
Vehicles powered by natural gas emit less of certain pollutants than those burning gasoline or diesel fuel.
Vehicles powered by ndatural gas emit less of certain pollutants than do those burning gasoline or diesel fuel.
The inclusion of do is optional.
With or without do, the intended comparison is clear:
Vehicles powered by natural gas emit less of certain pollutants than those burning gasoline or diesel fuel [emit certain pollutants].

No verb is required in the second clause as long as the intended comparison is crystal clear.
Correct:
John ate more pizza than Mary.
Here, only interpretation is possible:
John ate more pizza than Mary ate.
Since the intended comparison is crystal clear, a verb is not required in the second clause.

Not viable:
Russia exports more oil to Europe than the United States.
Here, the intended comparison is NOT crystal clear.
Two possible meanings:
Case 1: Russia exports more oil to Europe than IT EXPORTS OIL TO THE UNITED STATES.
Case 2: Russia exports more oil to Europe than THE UNITED STATES EXPORTS OIL TO EUROPE.
If Case 2 is intended, a verb is required in the second clause to make the intended comparison crystal clear.
Correct:
China exports more oil to Europe than DOES the United States.
Wonderful explanation. Thanks a lot
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1