BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Opinion on the Homeless

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:05 am
Thanked: 1 times
by calande » Fri May 30, 2008 12:54 am
Hey guys,

This one is tricky. I found that my response is the opposite of that of my text book. Please read the passage and answer the questions:
According to a recent study, the majority of people in a large city believe that most homeless people are drug addicts who could get jobs if they wanted to work. However, the public is misinformed. The city's Coalition for the Homeless estimates that over 85% of the homeless population is moderately to severely mentally ill.
  • Find the conclusion, evidence and assumption in the above argument
  • Prephrase a strenghener
  • Prephrase a weakener
Let's see what you come up with. Then I'll give you the response from my course book 8)
Calande.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Italy
Thanked: 1 times

by Carlo75 » Fri May 30, 2008 3:15 am
I think that here we have only two pieces of evidence:
1 - Public belief
2 - Coalition for the Homeless estimates

so the question stem should give us extra information in order to infer a conclusion or strengthen/weaken one of two evidence.

Thoughts?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:05 am
Thanked: 1 times

by calande » Fri May 30, 2008 3:50 am
And who should we contradict or back? 8)
Calande.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 5:44 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 6 times

by loki.gmat » Fri May 30, 2008 10:18 am
1) Conclusion - the public is misinformed.

2) Evidence - The city's Coalition for the Homeless estimates that over 85% of the homeless population is moderately to severely mentally ill.

3) Assumption - Moderately to severely mentally ill people are not drug addicts.

4) Strengther - a statement which strengthens the above assumption.

5) Weakener - weakens the above assumption.


Thanks!

Loki.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:05 am
Thanked: 1 times

by calande » Fri May 30, 2008 1:10 pm
Here's the answer of my text book:
Possible strengthener for the perception of the majority of the public about the homeless: The untreated mentality ill are more likely than others to succomb to illegal drug use.

Possible weakener for the perception of the public about the homeless: Mentally ill people are more susceptible to drug use than other members of the population.
Now, why do we have to weaken/strengthen the public instead of the author? I'm puzzled... I weakened/strengthened the author's belief according to which the public is misinformed.

What do you think?
Calande.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 5:44 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 6 times

by loki.gmat » Fri May 30, 2008 10:53 pm
i dont see any issue with the answers u have provided @calande.

plz remember we always have to weaken or strengthen the base on which an arguments stands.

Thanks!
Loki.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:05 am
Thanked: 1 times

by calande » Sat May 31, 2008 1:51 am
Thanks! Makes sense now ;)
Calande.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1