BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

One of the most ---please post your time

Expert replies
by atulmangal » Mon Apr 11, 2011 8:42 am
One of the most vexing problems in historiography is dating an event when the usual sources offer conflicting chronologies of the event. Historians should attempt to minimize the number of competing sources, perhaps by eliminating the less credible ones. Once this is achieved and several sources are left, as often happens, historians may try, though on occasion unsuccessfully, to determine independently of the usual sources which date is more likely to be right.
Which one of the following inferences is most strongly supported by the information above?

A. We have no plausible chronology of most of the events for which attempts have been made by historians to determine the right date.
B. Some of the events for which there are conflicting chronologies and for which attempts have been made by historians to determine the right date cannot be dated reliably by historians.
C. Attaching a reliable date to any event requires determining which of several conflicting chronologies is most likely to be true.
D. Determining independently of the usual sources which of several conflicting chronologies is more likely to be right is an ineffective way of dating events.
E. The soundest approach to dating an event for which the usual sources give conflicting chronologies is to undermine the credibility of as many of these sources as possible.

Guys please post the time too..
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Asher » Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:13 am
IMO C

Time - 2.30 mins[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by Target2009 » Mon Apr 11, 2011 10:48 am
IMO - B (2:02 Min.)
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:17 pm
Keyword : occasionally unsucessful

A) has "more" ,I forgot but a Knewton tutor explained the use of more very well.
B) some -- this word sounds good..

IMO B in 3min
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by Trader4Life » Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:42 pm
IMO, B, took me 3:53 min.

was struggling between B and C...eventually eliminated C because of the "conflicting chronologies"
Join the discussion

by rohu27 » Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:53 pm
Join the discussion

by Asher » Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:28 pm
Could someone please explain why the ans. is B.

I'm confused.

Thanks in advance.
Join the discussion

by rohu27 » Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:59 pm
Asher wrote:Could someone please explain why the ans. is B.

I'm confused.

Thanks in advance.
let me try if i can convince you with my reply.
remember its an inference question. so answer MUST be present in the stimulus. no assumptions allowed.

A-does the stimuus really talk abt historians who attempted to analyse the chrolonoly. it only suggests that they shud do it.

C-read the first line, we only want events for which we have conflicting evidence. answer choice C has "any event"

D-though the passage says historians may fail occassionally it is too strong an option to say its ineffective.

E-its not the best(soundest) approach as the passage itself points out flaws. also the point is not to undermine credibility of as many as possible, just remove the sources which are less credible, thts it. not to purposefully remove them.

now B-Some of the events for which there are conflicting chronologies and for which attempts have been made by historians to determine the right date cannot be dated reliably by historians - the passage clearly sates once the historians attempt to eliminate less credible sources they may still be unsuccesfull at times to determine which date is right.
(historians may try, though on occasion unsuccessfully, to determine independently of the usual sources which date is more likely to be right.)

it was between B and C for me. but C has a subtle word there. any event. that makes it out of contention.

hope tht helps.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:48 am
This:
rohu27 wrote:
now B-Some of the events for which there are conflicting chronologies and for which attempts have been made by historians to determine the right date cannot be dated reliably by historians - the passage clearly sates once the historians attempt to eliminate less credible sources they may still be unsuccesfull at times to determine which date is right.
(historians may try, though on occasion unsuccessfully, to determine independently of the usual sources which date is more likely to be right.)
is a wonderful explanation for why (B) is the supported inference.

And this:
B) some -- this word sounds good.
is great thinking, and, in fact, is the basis for a solid tip in inference questions:

An inference is something that must be true. But any extreme statement is difficult to prove. That's why one should avoid strongly worded (or "extreme") answer choices in inference. A corollary of this is that one should be partial to weakly worded or tentative answer choices in inference questions: a lot of right answers to inference questions contain language such as:

"not necessarily"
"generally"
"at least"
or, as here, "some."
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by AIM GMAT » Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:29 am
IMO B .

1:20 .

Is this from POwerscore CR bible ?
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT
Join the discussion

by rahul_tgsp » Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:58 am
IMO B
53 secs
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:07 am
OA is B guys
Join the discussion

by Asher » Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:18 pm
rohu27 wrote:
Asher wrote:Could someone please explain why the ans. is B.

I'm confused.

Thanks in advance.
let me try if i can convince you with my reply.
remember its an inference question. so answer MUST be present in the stimulus. no assumptions allowed.

A-does the stimuus really talk abt historians who attempted to analyse the chrolonoly. it only suggests that they shud do it.

C-read the first line, we only want events for which we have conflicting evidence. answer choice C has "any event"

D-though the passage says historians may fail occassionally it is too strong an option to say its ineffective.

E-its not the best(soundest) approach as the passage itself points out flaws. also the point is not to undermine credibility of as many as possible, just remove the sources which are less credible, thts it. not to purposefully remove them.

now B-Some of the events for which there are conflicting chronologies and for which attempts have been made by historians to determine the right date cannot be dated reliably by historians - the passage clearly sates once the historians attempt to eliminate less credible sources they may still be unsuccesfull at times to determine which date is right.
(historians may try, though on occasion unsuccessfully, to determine independently of the usual sources which date is more likely to be right.)

it was between B and C for me. but C has a subtle word there. any event. that makes it out of contention.

hope tht helps.
Thanks for the explanation, rohu27.
Join the discussion