BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

One of the ironies of contemporary history

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Fri Sep 22, 2017 1:29 pm
One of the ironies of contemporary history is that legitimate democratic processes have been exploited for the creation of anti-democratic regimes and when they promulgated and enforced laws denying the right to non-violent political opposition.

A. that legitimate democratic processes have been exploited for the creation of anti-democratic regimes and when they promulgated and enforced laws denying the right to non-violent political opposition

B. that legitimate democratic processes have been exploited for the creation of anti-democratic regimes and for the promulgation and enforcement of laws denying the right to non-violent political opposition

C. the exploitation of legitimate democratic processes to create anti-democratic regimes and the promulgation and enforcement of laws denying the right to non-violent political opposition

D. that legitimate democratic processes have been exploited for the creation of anti-democratic regimes as well as the promulgation and enforcing of laws denying the right to non-violent political opposition

E. how legitimate democratic processes have been exploited for the creation of anti-democratic regimes and their promulgating laws that deny the right to non-violent political opposition and enforcing them

What Option will give us the intended meaning? Please help me on this experts?

OA B
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Vincen » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:50 am
Experts, I can not find the mistake in option A. Why it is wrong?
Join the discussion

by EconomistGMATTutor » Wed Oct 25, 2017 3:04 pm
Hello!

This is an example of using parallel format to list two different effects or reasons for an action:

Action: democratic processes were exploited
Why were they exploited?:
FOR the creation of anti-democratic regimes
and
FOR the promulgation and enforcement of laws denying the right to non-violent political opposition

The problem with answer A is that instead of using "for," they use "when," which suggests the exploiting happened at the same time as the enforcement of laws - not as a later result of the exploitation. Therefore, answer B gives us the correct intended meaning.

I hope this helps! I'm available if you'd like any follow up.
GMAT Prep From The Economist
We offer 70+ point score improvement money back guarantee.
Our average student improves 98 points.

Image
Join the discussion

by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Jan 10, 2018 12:20 am
EconomistGMATTutor wrote:Hello!

This is an example of using parallel format to list two different effects or reasons for an action:

Action: democratic processes were exploited
Why were they exploited?:
FOR the creation of anti-democratic regimes
and
FOR the promulgation and enforcement of laws denying the right to non-violent political opposition

The problem with answer A is that instead of using "for," they use "when," which suggests the exploiting happened at the same time as the enforcement of laws - not as a later result of the exploitation. Therefore, answer B gives us the correct intended meaning.

I hope this helps! I'm available if you'd like any follow up.
Thanks a lot!
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1