Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

One more problem on absolute value

Expert replies
by getso » Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:02 pm
If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x| < x

(2) |x| > x
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by papgust » Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:22 pm
Well, the question can be phrased as "Is -1<x<1?". Let's look at the statements.

A. x / |x| < x

We have 2 cases here,
Case 1: If x < 0, then x / -x < x. x > -1.
Case 2: If x > 0, then x / x < x. x > 1.

Case 1 & 2 doesn't tell us whether -1<x<1. Insufficient.

B. |x| > x

Again, we have 2 cases here.
Case 1: If x < 0, then -x > x --> 2x < 0 --> x < 0
Case 2: If x > 0, then x > x. This solution is not possible.
So, we only know that x < 0. But we still do not know whether -1 < x < 1. Insufficient.

Combined,
From (A), we have 2 case (x > 0 and x < 0). From (B), we have only 1 case (x < 0)

From (A), we will take case (1) which is x > -1. And, we also know that x < 0. So, x lies between -1 and 0 (which answers the question -1 < x < 1).
Sufficient.

Hence, it should be C. Please share the OA
Join the discussion

by getso » Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:38 pm
amazing reply papgust. Yes, OA is C.

Thank you very much for the detailed explanation.

Regards,
Shobha
Join the discussion

by amittilak » Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:25 am
getso wrote:If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x| < x

(2) |x| > x

is lxl < 1 ??
Now lxl is always positive and what positive number, not equal to zero, is less than 1
Now, I rephrased the question as:
Is x a negative fraction ('coz it's given that x is not equal to zero)

S1. lxl is either -x or x. Lets look at both cases:
if lxl = -x, then x/-x < x
or -1<x
However this means that x could be a negative fraction or positive number Not suff.

S2 lxl > x this is easy to translate.
This means that x is a negative number (negative integer or negative fraction) hence not suff.

S1 + S2 tells us that x could be -ve fraction/+ve number or -ve fraction/-ve integer
Intersection of both is negative fraction. Hence suff.
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:31 am
getso wrote:If x is not equal to 0, is |x| less than 1?

(1) x/|x| < x

(2) |x| > x
|x| < 1 => -1<x<1

1. x < x|x| => x(1-|x|) < 0 => x>0 1<|x| or x<0 1>|x| so two cases.
2. |x| > x => x<0,

Combining 1&2: x<0 and so |x|<1 so C
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion