BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Data Sufficiency Problem..

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:59 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1 times

Data Sufficiency Problem..

by odod » Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:35 pm
Hi There,

I'm new and this is my first post. Im stuck on a question, which looks easy but I am having trouble understanding what its asking. The questions is:

"If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?
1) 5x + 1 = 3 + 2x
2) 0 < X < 1

I know in statement 1 x is 2/3 but don't understand the question. The answer is D. Can anyone help?

Thanks!
ODOD
Top
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2134
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 11:26 pm
Thanked: 237 times
Followed by:25 members
GMAT Score:730

Re: Data Sufficiency Problem..

by logitech » Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:50 pm
"If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x, is [x] = 0?

1) 5x + 1 = 3 + 2x

3x=2 so X is 2/3. 0.6


0 ... 0.6.......1

[x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x

So yes [x] can be 0 SUF




2) 0 < X < 1

Same logic with the first statement

0......x........1

[x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:59 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1 times

by odod » Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:03 pm
If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x,

Does [x] mean absolute value?

Im just trying to make sense of the question; im trying to sub [x] with a number

So does [9] denote the greatest integer less than or equal to 9? i dont get it..

I think im overlooking something really simple here; let me know if you see it.
ODOD
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 7:16 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by dipla » Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:04 pm
Here the question is - "IS [X]=0" ?

You have to answer yes or no.

Firstly you know if x is between -1 and 0 then only [X]=0 or else it will be
[X] not equal to 0.

1) x=0.6 ( Our answer No , it is not 0 )
2) x between 0 and 1 ( Our answer No, it is not 0 )

So in both cases you are able to answer (without doubts) So we can answer the question with any given condition- D
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:24 pm
odod wrote:If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x,

Does [x] mean absolute value?

Im just trying to make sense of the question; im trying to sub [x] with a number

So does [9] denote the greatest integer less than or equal to 9? i dont get it..
Yes, exactly: [9] is the greatest integer which is less than or equal to 9. What is the largest integer which is less than or equal to 9? It's 9. Essentially the [ ] function just rounds down to the nearest integer: [5.8] = 5, [17.1] = 17, [-0.3] = -1. The [ ] function is not in any way related to absolute value.

Now, in the question, from the first statement you can get a numerical answer for x, so you can certainly answer any question about x (even if you don't understand what the [ ] does precisely, hopefully it's clear that this statement is sufficient). The second statement tells us that 0 < x < 1, and if this is true, no matter what x is, [x] will round down to 0.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:59 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1 times

by odod » Wed Jan 14, 2009 6:36 pm
thanks gentlemen...makes sense now.
ODOD
Top
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:28 am

by r321 » Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:54 am
Ian Stewart wrote:
odod wrote:If [x] denotes the greatest integer less than or equal to x,

Does [x] mean absolute value?

Im just trying to make sense of the question; im trying to sub [x] with a number

So does [9] denote the greatest integer less than or equal to 9? i dont get it..
Yes, exactly: [9] is the greatest integer which is less than or equal to 9. What is the largest integer which is less than or equal to 9? It's 9. Essentially the [ ] function just rounds down to the nearest integer: [5.8] = 5, [17.1] = 17, [-0.3] = -1. The [ ] function is not in any way related to absolute value.

Now, in the question, from the first statement you can get a numerical answer for x, so you can certainly answer any question about x (even if you don't understand what the [ ] does precisely, hopefully it's clear that this statement is sufficient). The second statement tells us that 0 < x < 1, and if this is true, no matter what x is, [x] will round down to 0.
Hi,

I came across this question in OG12 as well. While I managed to solve the question correctly, reading the official answer explanation has confused me.

It says "It will be useful to observe that the condition [x] = 0 is equivalent to 0 ≤ x < 1." How?? I don't understand!

Can someone please help me understand how [x] = 0 is equivalent to 0 ≤ x < 1 .. Thanks!!
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1