BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Old Paper Test official CR = Technically a given category of

Expert replies
by richachampion » Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:06 pm
Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if, over time, claims against it plus expenses associated with it exceed total income from premiums. But premium income can be invested and will then yield returns of its own. Therefore, an underpriced policy does not represent a net loss in every case.

The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) No insurance policies are deliberately underpriced in order to attract customers to the insurance company offering such policies.
(B) A policy that represents a net loss to the insurance company is not an underpriced policy in every case.
(C) There are policies for which the level of claims per year can be predicted with great accuracy before premiums are set.
(D) The income earned by investing premium income is the most important determinant of an insurance company's profits.
(E) The claims against at least some underpriced policies do not require paying out all of the premium income from those policies as soon as it is earned.
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by richachampion » Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:07 pm
I selected B, but the OA based on what information I got from the forum is E.

My rationale behind B was I was guessing it on the basis as the Option B was establishing some sort of causality.

OA: E
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion

by Sun Light » Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:17 am
Premise premiums can be invested.

Conclusion.an underpriced policy might not be at loss.

Now at the time of doing the question I was looking for options that connects investment of premium to the conclusion..

As an approach, if I don't get any option that links or connects or doesn't logically comes between the premise and conclusion then I go for options that directly links with the conclusion.

In this case,I was held back by B, D, and E...But E was just too direct for the premise and conclusion.. so didn't gave a second read to B and D..

Any comments on the approach is welcome ...
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Sun Jan 08, 2017 11:01 am
richachampion wrote:Technically a given category of insurance policy is under priced if, over time, claims against it plus expenses associated with it exceed total income from premiums. But premium income can be invested and will then yield returns of its own. Therefore, an underpriced policy does not represent a net loss in every case.

The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) No insurance policies are deliberately underpriced in order to attract customers to the insurance company offering such policies.
(B) A policy that represents a net loss to the insurance company is not an underpriced policy in every case.
(C) There are policies for which the level of claims per year can be predicted with great accuracy before premiums are set.
(D) The income earned by investing premium income is the most important determinant of an insurance company's profits.
(E) The claims against at least some underpriced policies do not require paying out all of the premium income from those policies as soon as it is earned.
Conclusion: An underprice policy does not represent a net loss in every case.
Premises: underpriced means claims + expenses > income from premiums; premiums can be invested to yield returns.

When choosing between B and E, try negation.

B negated: A policy that represents a net loss to the insurance company is an underpriced policy in every case. Remember that the net is determined after the premiums are invested. The fact that there was a net loss simply tells us that the returns earned from investing the premiums wasn't enough to offset the initial gap. Therefore, It's certainly possible that every time there was a net loss, it was the case that claims + expenses > income from premiums.

E negated:The claims against all underpriced policies require paying out all of the premium income from those policies as soon as it is earned. If the insurance company has to pay out all of the premium income, they can't invest it. If they can't invest the premium income, they can't offset the shortfall caused by the underpriced policy. In this case, the negation destroys the argument. (And the correct answer to an Assumption question, when negated, will undermine the argument. So E is the correct answer.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion