Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

OG question 134 - estimated avg speed

Expert replies
by NadineKh » Tue Aug 15, 2017 1:00 am
Timer
00:00
Your answer
Difficulty–

right wrong

Pick an answer to see how members did

In planning for a car trip, Joan estimated both the distance of the trip, in miles, and her average speed, in miles per hour. She accurately divided her estimated distance by her estimated average speed to obtain an estimate for the time, in hours, that the trip would take. Was her estimate within 0.5 hour of the actual time that the trip took?
(1) Joan’s estimate for the distance was within 5 miles of the actual distance.
(2) Joan’s estimate for her average speed was within 10 miles per hour of her actual average speed.

Answer: E

How would you rephrase the problem and how would you solve it?
I'm trying to find a more systematic way to solve this type of problem than trying numbers.

Thank you!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Tue Aug 15, 2017 9:38 am
NadineKh wrote:In planning for a car trip, Joan estimated both the distance of the trip, in miles, and her average speed, in miles per hour. She accurately divided her estimated distance by her estimated average speed to obtain an estimate for the time, in hours, that the trip would take. Was her estimate within 0.5 hour of the actual time that the trip took?
(1) Joan’s estimate for the distance was within 5 miles of the actual distance.
(2) Joan’s estimate for her average speed was within 10 miles per hour of her actual average speed.

Answer: E

How would you rephrase the problem and how would you solve it?
I'm trying to find a more systematic way to solve this type of problem than trying numbers.

Thank you!
Well, I'm not sure I'd bother rephrasing this one. Here's how I think about it: you can dismiss each statement on its own almost immediately. The first statement tells you nothing about speed and the second tells you nothing about distance.

Together, we want to see if we can get a YES and a No to the original question. Well, we can obviously get a YES - it's possible that Joan estimated the distance and the speed with uncanny precision, getting both on the nose, and so she'd have gotten the time on the nose as well. So in this case, YES, her estimate would be within .5 hours of the actual time.

So all we need is a NO.
Actual distance = 5
Joan's estimate = 10

Actual speed = 20mph
Joan's estimate = 10mph

Actual Time = 5/20 = .25 hours
Joan's estimate = 10/10 = 1 hour
1 - .25 = .75, so NO, her estimate is not within .5 hours. Together the statements are not sufficient. The answer is E
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Tue Aug 15, 2017 10:00 am
Come to think of it, we don't have to think about this one very hard.

Together:
Scenario 1: She gets the distance and the rate exactly right - YES, she's within 5. hours of the actual time.

Scenario 2: actual rate = 0; estimated rate = 10. Clearly, NO, she's not within .5 hours of the actual time, no matter the distance. She's not moving.

Answer is E
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by NadineKh » Tue Aug 15, 2017 10:19 am
Thank you very much!!

It also helped me interpreting it more intuitively: since we have delta (differences between estimation and reality) in both numerator and denominator, we can't have an idea of the % deviation without knowing the value of the ratio.
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:35 pm
NadineKh wrote:In planning for a car trip, Joan estimated both the distance of the trip, in miles, and her average speed, in miles per hour. She accurately divided her estimated distance by her estimated average speed to obtain an estimate for the time, in hours, that the trip would take. Was her estimate within 0.5 hour of the actual time that the trip took?
(1) Joan’s estimate for the distance was within 5 miles of the actual distance.
(2) Joan’s estimate for her average speed was within 10 miles per hour of her actual average speed.
Target question: Was Joan's ESTIMATE within 0.5 hour of the ACTUAL TIME that the trip took?

Statement 1: Joan’s ESTIMATE for the distance was within 5 miles of the ACTUAL distance.
Travel time = distance/speed

Statement 1 provides information regarding the accuracy of Joan's estimation of the travel distance, BUT it does not provide any information regarding her accuracy in estimating her speed.
As such, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: Joan’s estimate for her average speed was within 10 miles per hour of her actual average speed.
Statement 2 provides information regarding the accuracy of Joan's estimation of her average speed, BUT it does not provide any information regarding her accuracy in estimating the travel distance.
As such, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Let's test some numbers.
There are several possible scenarios that satisfy BOTH statements. Here are two:
Case a: Joan's estimates were PERFECTLY accurate. In this case, her ACTUAL travel time was definitely WITHIN 0.5 hours of her ESTIMATED travel.

Case b: Joan's ESTIMATED distance and average speed were 8 miles and 8 miles per hour respectively, and the ACTUAL distance and average speed were 5 miles and 1 mile per hour respectively. So, Joan's ESTIMATED travel time = 8/8 = 1 hour, and her ACTUAL travel time = 5/1 = 5 hours. In this case, Joan's ACTUAL travel time was NOT WITHIN 0.5 hours of her ESTIMATED travel.

Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: E
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion