BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG Quant Review PS Q96 - Translation

Expert replies
by futjim » Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:09 am
Hi,

I'm having trouble understanding "the least integer greater than or equal to z" in the following question:

96. For all Z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z. Is [x] = 0?

s1) -1 < x < -0.1
s2) [x + 0.5] = 1

What does "the least integer greater than or equal to z" mean? Can someone explain it to me in English? I read this over and over last night and read it again today and I still can't comprehend the meaning to that statement.

Your help is greatly appreciated.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by kvcpk » Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:24 am
futjim wrote:Hi,

I'm having trouble understanding "the least integer greater than or equal to z" in the following question:

96. For all Z, [z] denotes the least integer greater than or equal to z. Is [x] = 0?

s1) -1 < x < -0.1
s2) [x + 0.5] = 1

What does "the least integer greater than or equal to z" mean? Can someone explain it to me in English? I read this over and over last night and read it again today and I still can't comprehend the meaning to that statement.

Your help is greatly appreciated.
hi..its actaully prety simple..
let us do [2.4]
What are the integers greater than or equal to 2.4?
3,4,5...
What is the least among them?
3
So [2.4] = 3

What is [5]?
Integers greater than or equal to 5 are 5,6,7,...
Leats among them is 5.
so [5] = 5

[] is called a step function. because, the graph looks like steps.

Hope this helps!!
Join the discussion

by gmatsensei » Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:31 am
:) happens to everyone one time or the other

Not sure if this helps much, try replacing "least" with "smallest"

-->"what is the smallest integer that is greater than or equal to z"

Once you see this question, a voice inside your head should say "hmm.. asking for smallest possible integer.. so maybe [z] will be a fraction..hmm... lets see the statements"

Now, if you've got this far then you can go ahead and look at the statements
Statement 1
-1<x<-0.1
--> so x lies between -1 and -0.1 --> the integers greater than x are 0,1,2..... Therefore, [x] i.e. the smallest possible integer greater than x, is 0.
You have a definite value for [x], so statement 1 alone is sufficient
Statement 2
[x + 0.5] = 1
Translating this -> the smallest integer that is greater than or equal to (x+0.5) is the integer 1
Be careful! The question is asking for [x].
Let's try getting different values for [x] and thius prove that this choice is insufficient
(i) assume x = 0.2 --> [0.2+0.5] = [0.7] = 1 ... and [x] = [0.2] = 1
(ii) assume x = -0.3 --> [-0.3+0.5] = [0.2] = 1 ... and [x] = [-0.3] = 0 ... ERROR! ERROR! ERROR! System meltdown :oops:


---> [spoiler]Answer is (A) because only statement I alone is sufficient[/spoiler]
Join the discussion