BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG Quant (Green Book) DS #80

Expert replies
by navalpike » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:36 pm
Hi all,
Would love to hear an expert’s opinion but all are welcome.

If xy>0, does (x-1)(y-1) = 1
1. x+y = xy
2. x=y

we can obviously conclude that 1. Is sufficient by re-writing the problem
xy-x-y+1=1……..which is the same as 1.
However, I would like to see where my thinking is wrong for the 2nd one because I concluded that it was sufficient.

If x=y, then
(y-1)(y-1)=1
Y^2-2y=0
Y(y-2)=0
Either y=0 or y=2.
Now, the stem mentions that xy>0, thus y cannot be 0, thus y=2
(x-1) (2-1)=1
(x-1)=1
x=2
We know both x & y and thus can solve the problem.

The OG explanation stops at y^2-2y=0, but can we not continue?
Would love to hear your opinion, thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by navalpike » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:42 pm
OA is A
Join the discussion

plug in some answer choices:

by jtjang99 » Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:22 pm
if xy>0, and x=y (from statement 2), then let's plug in 1 for x and y into the formula that is in the question stem. This yields 0=1, so the answer is no. Now let's plug in 2 for x and y (doing so still fulfills xy>0, and point 2) x=y). Plugging in 2 to the equation in the question stem yields 1=1, so the answer is yes. Because we get conflicting answers ("no" when we plug in 1 for x and y, and "yes" when we plug in 2 for x and y), point 2 (x=y) is insufficient.
Join the discussion

by navalpike » Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:56 pm
never mind. I think I figured out the problem.

I had already plugged in the info. from 2. into the question stem. It gave two choices for y. I wasn't allowed to plug it back into the stem a second time.
Join the discussion

by joymukhi » Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:55 am
Guys to help me understand ..what is the approach that we should we taking while solving such problems because going by the equation approach we would get y & x as 2 and the result 1. Going by substitution approach we get conflicting answers which makes the answer choice different. Appreciate if someone could shed some light on this. I went by y = 0 & y = 2 and got stumped. (2-1) (2-1) = 1 ..so why is it incorrect? Still not clear.
Join the discussion

by rah_pandey » Tue Jun 23, 2009 4:18 am
Use value plugging only when you want to prove that the statement given is false.

The equation approach is always the best approach mathematically but it takes time and you should be comfortable working with variables and inequalities

in the question asked using second condition we know

x=y so (x-1)*(y-1)=(x-1)^2

it can take any values and one of them can be 2 so II by itself is not sufficient. The approach used by Navalpike is wrong as he finds out for what x if any is (x-1)^2=1 but we need to tell if (x-1)^2=1 for all values of x>0
Join the discussion

by carpe_diem » Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:50 pm
(x - 1) (y - 1) = 1 ?
xy - (x+y) + 1 = 1
xy - (x+y) = 0
so does xy = (x+y) ?

state 1: x + y = xy ; Sufficient
state 2: x = y
Substitute this in original equation :
xy = (x+y)
x^2 = 2x
x^2 - 2x = 0
This equation will give 2 value of x and hence Not Sufficient.
OG wants to say that after the equation y^2 - 2y = 0 will give 2 value of y and hence inconclusive. Therefore Insufficient.
Join the discussion