BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG problem no 49, price per share

Expert replies
by inertia2010 » Wed Apr 27, 2011 9:31 am
Hi,

Can someone please explain this?

If the total price of n equally priced shares of a certain stock was $12,000, what was the price per share of the stock?
(1) If the price per share of the stock had been $1 more, the total price of the n shares would have been $300 more.

(2) If the price per share of the stock had been $2 less, the total price of the n shares would have been 5% less.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:44 am
inertia2010 wrote:Hi,

Can someone please explain this?

If the total price of n equally priced shares of a certain stock was $12,000, what was the price per share of the stock?
(1) If the price per share of the stock had been $1 more, the total price of the n shares would have been $300 more.

(2) If the price per share of the stock had been $2 less, the total price of the n shares would have been 5% less.
Price per share = (total cost)/(number of shares) = 12,000/n.
To determine the price per share, we need to know the value of n.
Question rephrased: What is the value of n?

Statement 1: If the price per share of the stock had been $1 more, the total price of the n shares would have been $300 more.
Since the price of each share is increasing by $1, and the total increase is $300, there must be 300 shares.
Thus, n=300.
Sufficient.

Statement 2: If the price per share of the stock had been $2 less, the total price of the n shares would have been 5% less.
For the total price to decrease by 5%, the price of each share must decrease by 5% (since each share is priced equally).
A sneaky way to avoid algebra: If the correct answer is D, then statement 2 must confirm the value of n determined in statement 1. Let's check:
If n=300, the price per share = 12,000/300 = 40.
5% of 40 is 2.
This works: a 5% reduction in the price per share = $2.
Thus, we know that n=300. If the number of shares is greater than or less than 300, then the price per share will change, and reducing the price by $2 will not result in a 5% decrease.
Sufficient.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by inertia2010 » Wed Apr 27, 2011 12:26 pm
got it, thanks!!!!
Join the discussion

by singalong » Thu Aug 18, 2011 2:54 am
MGMAT bokk translates the statement 2 as n{(1200/n) - 2}=0.95*12300

Isn't it supposed to be n{(1200/n) - 2}=0.95*12000
?
Join the discussion