BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is x > 0?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by [email protected] » Fri Sep 16, 2011 3:25 pm
ans is ddd

from 1: |x + 3| = 4x - 3
if x > 0, than x+3 = 4x -3 by solving this we get 6= 3x. thus x =2
if x< 0, than x +3 = -4x + 3, by solving this we get x =0 . but if we put x=0 in the question than we see that |x + 3| is not equal to 4x - 3. thus x is not equal to 0
(YOU CAN SEE THAT IF WE PUT X=2 IN THE INEQUALITY WE GET |x + 3| = 4x - 3
HENCE X = 2 THUS X >1
IN THE QUESTIONS RELATED TO MODE ALWAYS CROSS VERIFY THE INEQUALITY BY PUTTING VALUE IN THE QUESTION.

FROM 2: |x + 1| = 2x - 1
IF X>0 THAN, X+1 = 2X-1 . bY SOLVING THIS WE GET X= 2
IF X<0 THAN X+1 =2X-1. BY SOLVING THIS WE GET X = 0
PUT BOTH VALUES IN THE ORIGINAL INEQUALITIES. YOU WILL FIND THAT ONLY X=2 HOLD TRUE. THUS X= 2

HENCE ANSWER SHOULD BE D
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:59 am
my concern is, considering the test condition, must we always substitute
to confirm which of the solution is correct? I feel there are other ways
to arrive at the answer without carrying out his check.

For example, we know that the expression in an absolute sign is always >= 0
so, from (1) we can say 4x - 3 >= 0
and x >= 4/3. Also, x > 0. Sufficient

By the same token, x >= 1/2 and thus > 0
Also sufficient.

Can anyone point an error in my explanations please.
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Wed Sep 21, 2011 1:25 pm
gmatdriller wrote:

For example, we know that the expression in an absolute sign is always >= 0
so, from (1) we can say 4x - 3 >= 0
and x >= 4/3. Also, x > 0. Sufficient

By the same token, x >= 1/2 and thus > 0
Also sufficient.
That's the fast way to do the problem, and it's perfectly correct.
[email protected] wrote:ans is ddd

from 1: |x + 3| = 4x - 3
if x > 0, than x+3 = 4x -3 by solving this we get 6= 3x. thus x =2
if x< 0, than x +3 = -4x + 3, by solving this we get x =0 . but if we put x=0 in the question than we see that |x + 3| is not equal to 4x - 3. thus x is not equal to 0
Your analysis of these cases isn't quite right. |x+3| is equal to x+3 when *what's inside the absolute value* is positive. So |x+3| = x+3 when x > -3, not when x > 0. You then find, solving, the perfectly good solution x = 2. In the second case, |x+3| = -x-3 when what's inside the absolute value is negative. That is, |x+3| = -x-3 when x < -3 (and not when x < 0; |x+3| is still equal to x+3 if you plug in x = -1, say). So in the second case, when x < -3, we'd find, solving, that x = 0, but this solution doesn't agree with our assumption that x < -3, so cannot be a valid solution. You don't need to plug the value back into the equation.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Wed Sep 21, 2011 9:11 pm
I appreciate your explanations, Ian.
First assumption when absolute expression > 0
Is that x>-3; we got x =2....satisfied and x>0. Sufficient

Second assumption absolute expression < 0
Is that x < -3; but we got x= 0..Not a solution.
Not sufficient.

Thanks all for your inputs.
Join the discussion

by jaguar123 » Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:20 am
I get x = 2,0 in the both the choices. Can any help - why to choose A in a easy way.
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:03 am
jaguar123 wrote:I get x = 2,0 in the both the choices. Can any help -
why to choose A in a easy way.
Have you gone through the previous posts?
If yes and you still having problems, let me know for further explanations.
Join the discussion