BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG #38

Expert replies
by Reft » Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:47 pm
If p1 and p2 are the populations and r1 and r2 are the numbers of representatives of District 1 and District 2 , respectively, the ratio of the population to the number of representatives is greater for which of the two districts?

(1) p1 > p2

(2) r2 > r1

OA: C


I understand why they don't work individually, but do not understand how they work together.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Rahul@gurome » Sun Jul 11, 2010 5:04 pm
Ratio for district D1 = p1/r1
Ratio for district D2 = p2/r2

(1) p1 > p2 but we don't know r1 and r2, so (1) is NOT SUFFICIENT.

(2) r2 > r1 but we don't know p1 and p2, so (2) is NOT SUFFICIENT.

Combining (1) and (2), since p1 > p2 and r2 > r1, so when we divide p1/r1, we will get a larger number than the number we get by dividing p2/r2.
Hence p1/r1 > p2/r2

[spoiler]The correct answer is (C).
[/spoiler]
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by barcebal » Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:32 pm
Another way to think about it with some verbal/numbers

If the price of computer in State A is greater than state B the ONLY way for the TOTAL computer cost in state B to be greater than State A is if State B charges a higher tax rate than State A, which takes you back to understanding how Statement II is NS.

But since the tax rate in state B is less than A it is impossible for the cost of the computer in State B to get more expensive.

Now with some numbers.

Assume the pre-tax cost in State A is 100 and has a tax rate of 10%. Total cost of the computer is $110. If the computer in State B cost $99. Even if the tax rate in State B=the tax rate in State A, the total cost of the computer in State B is 108.90. But the tax rate has to be LOWER. There's no way to make up the ground if State A has a higher base price and a higher sales tax rate.
Join the discussion

by anoopprasad » Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:42 pm
Is P1/R1 > P2/R2 - that is the question
Since R1 and R2 cannot be negative we can cross multiply
So the question becomes

is P1R2 > P2R1
Since P1>P2 and R2>R1 we can conclude P1R2 > P2R1

So C
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Jul 12, 2010 3:22 am
Question: Is p1/r1 > p2/r2?

Let's take an example with real numbers:

Is 2/3 > 3/5?

One way to compare fractions is to give them a common denominator:

2/3 = 10/15
3/5 = 9/15

So the question becomes:

Is 10/15 > 9/15?

Since the two fractions now have the same denominator, we just have to compare the numerators: 10 > 9, so 2/3 > 3/5.

How did we get the 10 in 10/15? (denominator in 3/5) * (numerator in 2/3) = 5 * 2 = 10.
How did we get the 9 in 9/15? (denominator in 2/3) * (numerator in 3/5) = 3 * 3 = 9.

To compare fractions, we multiply the denominator in each fraction by the numerator in the other and compare the products.

Using this logic, Is p1/r1 > p2/r2? can be rewritten as:

Is r2 * p1 > r1 * p2?

Now let's examine statements 1 and 2 together:

Statement 1: p1 > p2
Statement 2: r2 > r1
So r2 * p1 > r1 * p2.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.

Hope this helps!
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by funshy » Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:44 am
let:
p1/r1 =y and
p2/r2 =x
objective: can you establish y>x or y<x. OR put in another way can you establish (y/x) greater than 1 or (y/x) less than 1. That is (y/x) > 1 or (y/x) < 1 obtainable from the information given?

y/x=(p1/r1)/(p2/r2)=(p1/r1)*(r2/p2) = (p1/p2)*(r2/r1)

No single statement provide the information to solve the equation above, but combining the two statements solve the problem hence answer is C
Join the discussion