BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 2016 CR Q Contrary to earlier predictions

Expert replies
by lionsshare » Mon Aug 28, 2017 4:54 pm
Contrary to earlier predictions, demand for sugarcane has not increased in recent years. Yet, even though prices and production amounts have also been stable during the last three years, sugarcane growers last year increased their profits by more than 10% over their previous year's level.

Any of the following statements, if true about last year, helps to explain the rise in profits EXCEPT:

(A) Many countries that are large consumers of sugarcane increased their production of sugarcane-based ethanol, yet their overall consumption decreased.
(B) Sugarcane growers have saved money on wages by switching from paying laborers an hourly wage to paying them by the amount harvested.
(C) The price of the oil, the major energy source used by sugarcane growers in harvesting their crops, dropped by more than 20%.
(D) Many small sugarcane growers joined together to form an association of sugarcane producers and began to buy supplies at low group rates.
(E) Rainfall in sugarcane-growing regions was higher than it had been during the previous year, allowing the growers to save money on expensive artificial irrigation.

OA: A

Why D can't be the answer?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by elias.latour.apex » Tue Aug 29, 2017 11:45 am
Our goal in this sentence is to explain the paradox. Demand for sugarcane has not increased, accordingly we think that prices have not risen nor are greater amounts of sugarcane being sold. Yet profits have increased.

Logically, we think that costs may have dropped somehow permitting growers to increase profit at the same price and same demand. All of the answer choices should indicate that costs are lower EXCEPT one.

Answer choice (A) does not provide any indication that the costs have dropped. This is the credited response.

Answer choice (D) does indicate that costs are lower. Small sugarcane growers are buying in association, obtaining supplies at low group rates.
Elias Latour
Verbal Specialist @ ApexGMAT
blog.apexgmat.com
+1 (646) 736-7622
Join the discussion

by elias.latour.apex » Tue Aug 29, 2017 11:45 am
Our goal in this sentence is to explain the paradox. Demand for sugarcane has not increased, accordingly we think that prices have not risen nor are greater amounts of sugarcane being sold. Yet profits have increased.

Logically, we think that costs may have dropped somehow permitting growers to increase profit at the same price and same demand. All of the answer choices should indicate that costs are lower EXCEPT one.

Answer choice (A) does not provide any indication that the costs have dropped. This is the credited response.

Answer choice (D) does indicate that costs are lower. Small sugarcane growers are buying in association, obtaining supplies at low group rates.
Elias Latour
Verbal Specialist @ ApexGMAT
blog.apexgmat.com
+1 (646) 736-7622
Join the discussion