Many of the earliest known images of Hindu deities
in India date from the time of the Kushan Empire,
fashioned either from the spotted sandstone of
Mathura or Gandharan grey schist.
(A) Empire, fashioned either from the spotted
sandstone of Mathura or
(B) Empire, fashioned from either the spotted
sandstone of Mathura or from
(C) Empire, either fashioned from the spotted
sandstone of Mathura or
(D) Empire and either fashioned from the spotted
sandstone of Mathura or from
(E) Empire and were fashioned either from the
spotted sandstone of Mathura or from
OG 12 : Kushan empire
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:30 pm
- Thanked: 4 times
There are 2 things:
1 - the images date from the time of Kushan Empire
2 - they are fashioned from sandstone and schist
Here the parallel structure will be something like : "from X and from Y"
This will narrow our focus to option D & E
of which answer is E (date || were fashioned)
1 - the images date from the time of Kushan Empire
2 - they are fashioned from sandstone and schist
Here the parallel structure will be something like : "from X and from Y"
This will narrow our focus to option D & E
of which answer is E (date || were fashioned)
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
In the construction either X or Y, EITHER and OR are sometimes called SEESAW conjunctions.
The reason is that -- like two people on a seesaw -- X and Y must BALANCE EACH OTHER.
(A) either from the spotted sandstone of Mathura or Ganharan grey schist.
(B) either the spotted sandstone of Mathura or from Gandharan grey schist.
(C) either fashioned from the spotted sandstone of Mathura or Gandharan grey schist.
(D) either fashioned from the spotted sandstone of Mathura or from Gandharan grey schist.
(E) either FROM THE SPOTTED SANDSTONE OF MATHURA or FROM GANDHARAN GREY SCHIST.
Only E offers the required parallelism.
The correct answer is E.
The reason is that -- like two people on a seesaw -- X and Y must BALANCE EACH OTHER.
(A) either from the spotted sandstone of Mathura or Ganharan grey schist.
(B) either the spotted sandstone of Mathura or from Gandharan grey schist.
(C) either fashioned from the spotted sandstone of Mathura or Gandharan grey schist.
(D) either fashioned from the spotted sandstone of Mathura or from Gandharan grey schist.
(E) either FROM THE SPOTTED SANDSTONE OF MATHURA or FROM GANDHARAN GREY SCHIST.
Only E offers the required parallelism.
The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Hi,
Can you please explain a nagging issue:
1) If there is a comma separating two clauses, don't the two clauses need some sort of coordinating conjunction such as "and or but" and don't the two clauses need to be independent?
2) I eliminated A and B because the second part of the clause because it's not independent. Was that wrong?
3) What is the general rule when we have a comma with a coordinating conjunction. Conversely, what is the general rule when we have a comma without a coordinating conjunction?
Thanks!
Can you please explain a nagging issue:
1) If there is a comma separating two clauses, don't the two clauses need some sort of coordinating conjunction such as "and or but" and don't the two clauses need to be independent?
2) I eliminated A and B because the second part of the clause because it's not independent. Was that wrong?
3) What is the general rule when we have a comma with a coordinating conjunction. Conversely, what is the general rule when we have a comma without a coordinating conjunction?
Thanks!
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 4:22 am
- Thanked: 12 times
- Followed by:8 members
Hi,
Can you please explain a nagging issue:
1) If there is a comma separating two clauses, don't the two clauses need some sort of coordinating conjunction such as "and or but" and don't the two clauses need to be independent?
A comma always joins one independent and one dependent clause
Independent clause + Independent clause - use the semicolon
Independent clause + Dependent clause - use the comma
Dependent clause + Independent clause - use the comma
2) I eliminated A and B because the second part of the clause because it's not independent. Was that wrong?
A and B were wrong because of incorrect idiom usage
Can you please explain a nagging issue:
1) If there is a comma separating two clauses, don't the two clauses need some sort of coordinating conjunction such as "and or but" and don't the two clauses need to be independent?
A comma always joins one independent and one dependent clause
Independent clause + Independent clause - use the semicolon
Independent clause + Dependent clause - use the comma
Dependent clause + Independent clause - use the comma
2) I eliminated A and B because the second part of the clause because it's not independent. Was that wrong?
A and B were wrong because of incorrect idiom usage
- ilyana
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 12:32 pm
- Location: Orange, TX
- Thanked: 66 times
- Followed by:4 members
- GMAT Score:760
Russ9,
Just to clarify things:
The structure of the sentence:
A) A clause (independent) + ED-modifier
B) A clause (independent) + ED-modifier
C) A clause (independent) + ED-modifier
D) A clause [many of images date] + AND + ED-modifier [fashioned from] ---- completely wrong structure
E) A clause [many of images date and were fashioned]
"date" and "were fashioned" are parallel verbs
The second reason is ED-modifier that seems to modify the noun immediately preceding it: "the Kushan Empire".
On the GMAT COMMA + ED-modifiers tend to modify nouns/noun-phrases immediately preceding the structure.
In my understanding:
INDEPENDENT CLAUSE:
Coordinating conjunction (not mandatory; a clause without a coordinating conjunction is still an independent clause) + noun + verb
*coordinating conjunction: FANBOYS - for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so
DEPENDENT CLAUSE:
Subordinating conjunction (mandatory) + noun + verb
* Subordinating conjunctions: there are a lot of them.
https://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/conjunctions.htm --- a nice article to read on this matter
Just to clarify things:
The structure of the sentence:
A) A clause (independent) + ED-modifier
B) A clause (independent) + ED-modifier
C) A clause (independent) + ED-modifier
D) A clause [many of images date] + AND + ED-modifier [fashioned from] ---- completely wrong structure
E) A clause [many of images date and were fashioned]
"date" and "were fashioned" are parallel verbs
Incorrect idiom usage is one reason for elimination.2) I eliminated A and B because the second part of the clause because it's not independent. Was that wrong?
A and B were wrong because of incorrect idiom usage
The second reason is ED-modifier that seems to modify the noun immediately preceding it: "the Kushan Empire".
On the GMAT COMMA + ED-modifiers tend to modify nouns/noun-phrases immediately preceding the structure.
In my understanding:
INDEPENDENT CLAUSE:
Coordinating conjunction (not mandatory; a clause without a coordinating conjunction is still an independent clause) + noun + verb
*coordinating conjunction: FANBOYS - for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so
DEPENDENT CLAUSE:
Subordinating conjunction (mandatory) + noun + verb
* Subordinating conjunctions: there are a lot of them.
https://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/conjunctions.htm --- a nice article to read on this matter
Please click on "Thank" button if you think my post is helpful.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ilyana-anderson-481846127/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ilyana-anderson-481846127/
I went for the meaning in order to solve this.psm12se wrote:Many of the earliest known images of Hindu deities
in India date from the time of the Kushan Empire,
fashioned either from the spotted sandstone of
Mathura or Gandharan grey schist.
(A) Empire, fashioned either from the spotted
sandstone of Mathura or
(B) Empire, fashioned from either the spotted
sandstone of Mathura or from
(C) Empire, either fashioned from the spotted
sandstone of Mathura or
(D) Empire and either fashioned from the spotted
sandstone of Mathura or from
(E) Empire and were fashioned either from the
spotted sandstone of Mathura or from
The modifier fashioned either from the spotted sandstone of Mathura or Gandharan grey schist incorrectly modifies Kushan Empire in A, B and C
Option D lacks a verb.
E describes the meaning correctly and maintains parallelism.