BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 11 - x+y problem

Expert replies
by maxim730 » Mon Feb 05, 2007 6:19 am
From OG 11

Problem 139 or 140:

If x != -y, is (x-y)/(x+y) > 1? ( != means not equal)

1) x>0
2) y<0

I don't understand their solution. OA when a couple of people reply.

P.S.

is it ok for me to rewrite the inequality as x-y > x+y?


MY REASONING:

Here is my reasoning. Please critique and help me understand what I'm doing wrong!

1) X>0

x = 1, y = 2

(1-2)/(1+2) > 1 NO

x = 3 y = -1

(3-(-1))/(3+(-1)) > 1
4/2 > 1 YES

so INSUFFICIENT

2) y < 0


x = 3 y = -1

(3-(-1))/(3+(-1)) > 1
4/2 > 1 YES

x = -2, y = -1

(-2-(-)1)/(-2+(-1)) > 1
-1/-3 > 1 NO

so INSUFFICIENT

Both 1 and 2)

I rewrote the inequality as x-y > x+y

x>0 and y<0

x = 2 y = -3

2-(-3) > 2+(-3)
5 > -1 YES

x = 4 y = -2

4+2 > 2 YES

So, why not C? What am i doing wrong?!?!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by banona » Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:00 pm
Hi,
you reasoning is missing an important thing which the following :
in order to rewrite ( x-y)/(x+y)> 1 in the following form ( x-y)>(x+y),your multiplying both sides of the inequality by ( x+y), in which case you need to now the sign ( x+y) in order to keep or to inverse the inequality;
In your case, you supposed that it's positive number;
back to the DS question, we are given to information about x>0, which is insuffisant,
Knowing that y<0; then we ca conclude that:
x-y is a STRICT postive number and that ( x-y > x+y) , dividig all by (x-y), we find that ( x+y)/(x-y)< 1; One can conclude that by inversing the inequality we could find that ( x-y)/(x+y) > 1; but we can not do that unless we know the sign of ( x+y); consequently
E is the answer;

to be more confident pick the following numbers with x >0 and y<0

you can consider : x = 10 and y = -1 ( this works)
but if x =1 and y = -2 ( this doesnt work)


I hope this could help

ANY COMMENT

Banona
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Mon May 10, 2010 11:51 pm
banona wrote:Hi,
you reasoning is missing an important thing which the following :
in order to rewrite ( x-y)/(x+y)> 1 in the following form ( x-y)>(x+y),your multiplying both sides of the inequality by ( x+y), in which case you need to now the sign ( x+y) in order to keep or to inverse the inequality;
In your case, you supposed that it's positive number;
back to the DS question, we are given to information about x>0, which is insuffisant,
Knowing that y<0; then we ca conclude that:
x-y is a STRICT postive number and that ( x-y > x+y) , dividig all by (x-y), we find that ( x+y)/(x-y)< 1; One can conclude that by inversing the inequality we could find that ( x-y)/(x+y) > 1; but we can not do that unless we know the sign of ( x+y); consequently
E is the answer;

to be more confident pick the following numbers with x >0 and y<0

you can consider : x = 10 and y = -1 ( this works)
but if x =1 and y = -2 ( this doesnt work)


I hope this could help

ANY COMMENT

Banona
hi,
i think i'd like to solve this in different way.
x#-y , (x-y)/(x+y)>1
=> x-y>x+y => 2y<0 => y<0
thus, i think only 2 is enough to answer the question.
how do you guys think? please post the answer
Join the discussion

by raviki8208 » Tue May 11, 2010 12:24 am
maxim730 wrote:From OG 11

Problem 139 or 140:

If x != -y, is (x-y)/(x+y) > 1? ( != means not equal)

1) x>0
2) y<0

I don't understand their solution. OA when a couple of people reply.

P.S.

is it ok for me to rewrite the inequality as x-y > x+y?


MY REASONING:

Here is my reasoning. Please critique and help me understand what I'm doing wrong!

1) X>0

x = 1, y = 2

(1-2)/(1+2) > 1 NO

x = 3 y = -1

(3-(-1))/(3+(-1)) > 1
4/2 > 1 YES

so INSUFFICIENT

2) y < 0


x = 3 y = -1

(3-(-1))/(3+(-1)) > 1
4/2 > 1 YES

x = -2, y = -1

(-2-(-)1)/(-2+(-1)) > 1
-1/-3 > 1 NO

so INSUFFICIENT

Both 1 and 2)

I rewrote the inequality as x-y > x+y

x>0 and y<0

x = 2 y = -3

2-(-3) > 2+(-3)
5 > -1 YES

x = 4 y = -2

4+2 > 2 YES

So, why not C? What am i doing wrong?!?!
Hi,

We should not rewrite the inequality as x-y > x+y?

It depends on the sign of the denominator.
a/b > 1 => a > b if b is +ve
a/b > 1 => a < b if b is -ve

see an example below,
3/2 > 1 => 3 > 2
(-3)/(-2) > 1 => -3 < -2


MY reasoning,

Given, x+y != 0


1) x > 0

case1: if x+y > 0 & y > 0, x-y can be -ve so (x-y)/(x+y) can be < 0 NOT SATISFIED
case2: if x+y > 0 & y < 0, x-y always > x+y
case3: if x+y < 0 & y > 0, NOT possible
case4: if x+y < 0 & y < 0, x-y is +ve and x+y is -ve => (x-y)/(x+y) < 0 NOT SATISFIED

2) y < 0

case4 above is not satisfied so, no need to go further

using both, case4 above is not satisfied so, no need to go further

so E
Join the discussion

by Nipun Ravi » Tue May 11, 2010 12:57 am
Maxim730: You were doing absolutely right until you tested the last condition (both statement 1 and 2 to be true).

You already tested a YES case with x>0 and y<0, however if you consider x=1 and y=-5, still x>0 and y<0 and x!=-y.

In this case (x-y)/(x+y)=(1-(-5))/(1+(-5))=(1+5)/(1-5)=6/(-4)=-(3/2) which is less than 1, so you arrive at a NO situation.

Thus both 1 and 2 together are also not consistent.

Thus the answer is E.
Join the discussion