BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

og 104

Expert replies
by nafiul9090 » Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:06 pm
Although the discount stores in Goreville's central
shopping district are expected to close within fi ve
years as a result of competition from a SpendLess
discount department store that just opened, those
locations will not stay vacant for long. In the fi ve years
since the opening of Colson's, a nondiscount
department store, a new store has opened at the
location of every store in the shopping district that
closed because it could not compete with Colson's.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens
the argument?
(A) Many customers of Colson's are expected to do
less shopping there than they did before the
SpendLess store opened.
(B) Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the
central shopping district since Colson's opened
have been discount stores.
(C) At present, the central shopping district has as
many stores operating in it as it ever had.
(D) Over the course of the next fi ve years, it is
expected that Goreville's population will grow at
a faster rate than it has for the past several
decades.
(E) Many stores in the central shopping district sell
types of merchandise that are not available at
either SpendLess or Colson's.


i find it difficult to construct the structure of the argument of the stimuli.....help needed
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by badpoem » Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:49 pm
The conclusion here is : The locations where discount shops have opened will not stay vacant for long because the shops will close down.

Reasoning: Every time a non-discount store opened, it closed down because of competition from Colson's - a non discount store.

But hasn't a discount shop opened right now?

(A) Many customers of Colson's are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the
SpendLess store opened. --> less shopping from a discount/non-discount store? In any case, less shopping does not mean that the shop will close down. - Not so strong a weakener.

(B) Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson's opened have been discount stores. - Ah, what happened to them? have they closed down? No, because the competition here is only from Colson's - a discount store.

(C) At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had. --> Wow, Thanks for the info. Does not help weaken but.

(D) Over the course of the next fi ve years, it is expected that Goreville's population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades. --> Ok. So? Does not mean that they will all shop. - Does not help.

(E) Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson's. --> Ok. Thanks for the info again. But no help.

So, IMHO, (B)

What is the OA?
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:11 am
OA B

1 Doubt against OG
E) Many stores in the central shopping district sell
types of merchandise that are not available at
either SpendLess or Colson's.
OG says this sttmnt doesnt say whether stores will close or not
But if stores sell types of merchandise that are not available at
either SpendLess or Colson's , why would they close down.
I eliminated E because of the presence of `Many
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion