q asks whther c(a-b)>d(a-b)
from 1 c>d but a-b can be =0 or a-b>0 so not suff
from 2 b>a, here also we knw one part of the equality is +ve, but c may be > or < d so not suff.
taken 1 and 2 together,
both the sides of c(a-b)>d(a-b) are negative and C>D so c(a-b)<d(a-b)
so C is enough.
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
Cool DS
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
Edit: awww! missed that, In my case (c-d) could be 0... and both sides would be equal. Yeah, it should be (C).
Really?! I got (B)!...
If a, b, c, and d are positive, is ac + bd > bc + ad?
ac + bd > bc + ad ?
ac - ad > bc - bd ?
a(c-d) > b (c-d) ?
Divide by (c-d) on both sides
a > c ?
1) c > d
Insufficient to answer
2) b > a
a < b Sufficient to answer
Really?! I got (B)!...
If a, b, c, and d are positive, is ac + bd > bc + ad?
ac + bd > bc + ad ?
ac - ad > bc - bd ?
a(c-d) > b (c-d) ?
Divide by (c-d) on both sides
a > c ?
1) c > d
Insufficient to answer
2) b > a
a < b Sufficient to answer
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."
Rephrase the question:tonebeeze wrote:If a, b, c, and d are positive, is ac + bd > bc + ad?
1. c > d
2. b > a
OA = C
ac + bd > bc + ad
ac - bc > ad - bd
c(a-b) > d(a-b).
Question rephrased: Is c(a-b) > d(a-b)?
Statement 1: c>d.
Let c=2, d = 1, and a-b = 20-10 = 10.
Is 2*10 > 1*10? Yes.
Let c=1, d=2, and a-b = 10-20 = -10.
Is 2(-10) > 1(-10)? No.
Since in the first case the answer is Yes, and in the second case the answer is No, insufficient.
Statement 2: b > a.
Let b=20 and a=10 so that a-b = -10.
Let c=1 and d=2.
Is 1(-10) > 2(-10)? Yes.
Let c=2 and d=1.
Is 2(-10) > 1(-10)? No.
Since in the first case the answer is Yes, and in the second case the answer is No, insufficient.
Statements 1 and 2 combined: c>d and b>a.
Thus, a-b < 0.
Since c>d, c(a-b) will be further below 0 than will be d(a-b).
Thus, we know that c(a-b) < d(a-b).
Sufficient.
The correct answer is C.
Be careful when using division to simplify an expression.
Once the question has been rephrased as Is c(a-b) > d(a-b)?, it's dangerous to divide by (a-b) because we don't know the value of (a-b).
If (a-b) = 0, then the quotient will be undefined.
If (a-b) < 0, then the direction of the inequality will have to change from > to <.
Since we don't know the value of (a-b), plugging in values is a safer approach for most test-takers.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
When I see that all four of the expressions ac, bc, ad and bd, are being added and subtracted here, I'll think of factorizations that look something like (a+b)(c+d) or (a-b)(c-d). We can rewrite the questiontonebeeze wrote:If a, b, c, and d are positive, is ac + bd > bc + ad?
1. c > d
2. b > a
OA = C
Is ac + bd > bc + ad ?
Is ac - ad - bc + bd > 0 ?
Is (a - b)(c - d) > 0 ?
Now you can see immediately that neither statement is sufficient alone, but together we know the sign of both factors and can therefore find the sign of their product, so the answer is C.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com
ianstewartgmat.com













