Cool DS

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 158
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:49 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:3 members

Cool DS

by tonebeeze » Mon Apr 25, 2011 4:48 pm
If a, b, c, and d are positive, is ac + bd > bc + ad?

1. c > d
2. b > a

OA = C

Legendary Member
Posts: 586
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:38 am
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:730

by rohu27 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:08 pm
q asks whther c(a-b)>d(a-b)
from 1 c>d but a-b can be =0 or a-b>0 so not suff
from 2 b>a, here also we knw one part of the equality is +ve, but c may be > or < d so not suff.
taken 1 and 2 together,
both the sides of c(a-b)>d(a-b) are negative and C>D so c(a-b)<d(a-b)
so C is enough.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 243
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:12 am
Location: Dominican Republic
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:480

by MAAJ » Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:01 am
Edit: awww! missed that, In my case (c-d) could be 0... and both sides would be equal. Yeah, it should be (C).

Really?! I got (B)!...

If a, b, c, and d are positive, is ac + bd > bc + ad?
ac + bd > bc + ad ?
ac - ad > bc - bd ?
a(c-d) > b (c-d) ?
Divide by (c-d) on both sides
a > c ?

1) c > d
Insufficient to answer

2) b > a
a < b Sufficient to answer
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:33 am
tonebeeze wrote:If a, b, c, and d are positive, is ac + bd > bc + ad?

1. c > d
2. b > a

OA = C
Rephrase the question:
ac + bd > bc + ad
ac - bc > ad - bd
c(a-b) > d(a-b).

Question rephrased: Is c(a-b) > d(a-b)?

Statement 1: c>d.
Let c=2, d = 1, and a-b = 20-10 = 10.
Is 2*10 > 1*10? Yes.

Let c=1, d=2, and a-b = 10-20 = -10.
Is 2(-10) > 1(-10)? No.
Since in the first case the answer is Yes, and in the second case the answer is No, insufficient.

Statement 2: b > a.
Let b=20 and a=10 so that a-b = -10.

Let c=1 and d=2.
Is 1(-10) > 2(-10)? Yes.

Let c=2 and d=1.
Is 2(-10) > 1(-10)? No.
Since in the first case the answer is Yes, and in the second case the answer is No, insufficient.

Statements 1 and 2 combined: c>d and b>a.
Thus, a-b < 0.
Since c>d, c(a-b) will be further below 0 than will be d(a-b).
Thus, we know that c(a-b) < d(a-b).
Sufficient.

The correct answer is C.

Be careful when using division to simplify an expression.
Once the question has been rephrased as Is c(a-b) > d(a-b)?, it's dangerous to divide by (a-b) because we don't know the value of (a-b).
If (a-b) = 0, then the quotient will be undefined.
If (a-b) < 0, then the direction of the inequality will have to change from > to <.
Since we don't know the value of (a-b), plugging in values is a safer approach for most test-takers.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2621
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Tue Apr 26, 2011 10:57 am
tonebeeze wrote:If a, b, c, and d are positive, is ac + bd > bc + ad?

1. c > d
2. b > a

OA = C
When I see that all four of the expressions ac, bc, ad and bd, are being added and subtracted here, I'll think of factorizations that look something like (a+b)(c+d) or (a-b)(c-d). We can rewrite the question

Is ac + bd > bc + ad ?
Is ac - ad - bc + bd > 0 ?
Is (a - b)(c - d) > 0 ?

Now you can see immediately that neither statement is sufficient alone, but together we know the sign of both factors and can therefore find the sign of their product, so the answer is C.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com