OG-10 Question#183 doubt.

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:04 pm
GMAT Score:690

by chakri4gmat » Fri Mar 27, 2009 3:58 am
But isnt the correct option ( D )to the formulas sentence violating parallelism ?

D is in the form "X does not apply to A as to B"

isnt it supposed to be "X does not apply to A as it does/applies to B"

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:11 am
You don't need to repeat the verb. You can, but you don't have to - and they don't. That's part of what makes this one hard. :)

to X <in the same way as> to Y.

First, the "to X" and "to Y" parts are parallel, as they should be, because they are the two things being compared.

Second, this is an example of an elliptical construction, in which we can infer the missing meaning:

Formulas do not apply to X in the same way as (they do) to Y.

The fact that we have a comparison ("in the same way as") and the necessary parts are properly parallel allows us to make the inference.

An elliptical construction lacks some word (or words) that are nevertheless easily able to be inferred. See this if you're interested in more detail: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptical_clause
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me