Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuations in the financial markets
B)so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
C)so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
D) gradual enough not to be indistinguishable
E)gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them
OA A
Please explain, I didnt like any and choseE
Often major economic shifts are ....
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:22 am
- Location: hyderabad
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:31 am
- Location: Bangalore
- GMAT Score:730
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
GMAT/MBA Expert
- ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
I had a request to answer this one. This question is from GMATPrep.
A) so gradual as to be indistinguishable
"so... as to be..." is a correct idiom.
B) so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
"so... so that..." is not a correct idiom
C) so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
This one is tough, because it's not grammatically or idiomatically incorrect. "So... that" is a correct idiom. It's certainly wordier than A, and there also seems to be a disconnect in meaning. If something is "indistinguishable," then people are not able to distinguish it. Here, saying that the "shifts... are unable to be distinguished," then the lack of ability is on the part of the shifts, and not on the people distinguishing. This is a case in which passive voice alters the meaning slightly, and therefore makes less sense.
D) gradual enough not to be indistinguishable
"gradual enough" means something different from "so gradual." "Enough" implies a sufficient quantity, above a certain threshold - "I have enough money to by the new laptop." "So" is a qualifier meaning "to such a degree that." For example, "I have so much money that I could buy all of the laptops in the world." It doesn't imply any threshold.
E) gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them
Same issue as in D.
The correct answer is A.
The issues here are IDIOMS, MEANING, and CONCISION.Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuations in the financial markets
A) so gradual as to be indistinguishable
B) so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
C) so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
D) gradual enough not to be indistinguishable
E) gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them
A) so gradual as to be indistinguishable
"so... as to be..." is a correct idiom.
B) so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
"so... so that..." is not a correct idiom
C) so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
This one is tough, because it's not grammatically or idiomatically incorrect. "So... that" is a correct idiom. It's certainly wordier than A, and there also seems to be a disconnect in meaning. If something is "indistinguishable," then people are not able to distinguish it. Here, saying that the "shifts... are unable to be distinguished," then the lack of ability is on the part of the shifts, and not on the people distinguishing. This is a case in which passive voice alters the meaning slightly, and therefore makes less sense.
D) gradual enough not to be indistinguishable
"gradual enough" means something different from "so gradual." "Enough" implies a sufficient quantity, above a certain threshold - "I have enough money to by the new laptop." "So" is a qualifier meaning "to such a degree that." For example, "I have so much money that I could buy all of the laptops in the world." It doesn't imply any threshold.
E) gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them
Same issue as in D.
The correct answer is A.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
- gmat_for_life
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 7:43 am
Thanks a lot Celilidh for your detailed analysis!
So if I'm able to understand option C correctly, its basically telling that the 'economic shifts' are not able to distinguish themselves. Is that correct?
Regards,
Amit
So if I'm able to understand option C correctly, its basically telling that the 'economic shifts' are not able to distinguish themselves. Is that correct?
Regards,
Amit
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 2:52 pm
- Thanked: 4 times
- Followed by:1 members
Thanks for wonderful explanation.ceilidh.erickson wrote:I had a request to answer this one. This question is from GMATPrep.
The issues here are IDIOMS, MEANING, and CONCISION.
A) so gradual as to be indistinguishable
"so... as to be..." is a correct idiom.
B) so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
"so... so that..." is not a correct idiom
C) so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
This one is tough, because it's not grammatically or idiomatically incorrect. "So... that" is a correct idiom. It's certainly wordier than A, and there also seems to be a disconnect in meaning. If something is "indistinguishable," then people are not able to distinguish it. Here, saying that the "shifts... are unable to be distinguished," then the lack of ability is on the part of the shifts, and not on the people distinguishing. This is a case in which passive voice alters the meaning slightly, and therefore makes less sense.
D) gradual enough not to be indistinguishable
"gradual enough" means something different from "so gradual." "Enough" implies a sufficient quantity, above a certain threshold - "I have enough money to by the new laptop." "So" is a qualifier meaning "to such a degree that." For example, "I have so much money that I could buy all of the laptops in the world." It doesn't imply any threshold.
E) gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them
Same issue as in D.
The correct answer is A.
Is it correct that GMAT prefers so to enough?
Best,
GMAT/MBA Expert
- ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
Exactly right!gmat_for_life wrote:Thanks a lot Celilidh for your detailed analysis!
So if I'm able to understand option C correctly, its basically telling that the 'economic shifts' are not able to distinguish themselves. Is that correct?
Regards,
Amit
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
GMAT/MBA Expert
- ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
That really depends on the context. "Enough" is perfectly correct when the intended meaning is having reached a sufficient threshold.aflaam wrote: Is it correct that GMAT prefers so to enough?
Best,
Here's an example of when "enough" was correctly used in OG 2015 #99. Notice that "enough" is outside of the underlined portion:
If the the choice is between "so" and "enough" when the intended meaning is "to such a degree that," pick "so."The stars, some of them at tremendous speeds, are in motion just as the planets are, yet being so far away from Earth that their apparent positions in the sky do not change enough for their movement to be observed during a single human lifetime.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2015 3:56 am
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:750
Ceilidh,
GMAT seems to be particularly fond of this idiom. Here is another official example where this idiom appears in correct choice. -
The Emperor Augustus, it appears, commissioned an idealized sculptured portrait, the features of which are so unrealistic as to constitute what one scholar calls an "artificial face."
(A) so unrealistic as to constitute
(B) so unrealistic they constituted
(C) so unrealistic that they have constituted
(D) unrealistic enough so that they constitute
(E) unrealistic enough so as to constitute
I think what they do here is - have this slightly uncommon but correct idiom in the correct choie and have a more popular so..that in an incorrect choice and thus lure a test taker into choosing a wrong answer.
What do you think?
GMAT seems to be particularly fond of this idiom. Here is another official example where this idiom appears in correct choice. -
The Emperor Augustus, it appears, commissioned an idealized sculptured portrait, the features of which are so unrealistic as to constitute what one scholar calls an "artificial face."
(A) so unrealistic as to constitute
(B) so unrealistic they constituted
(C) so unrealistic that they have constituted
(D) unrealistic enough so that they constitute
(E) unrealistic enough so as to constitute
I think what they do here is - have this slightly uncommon but correct idiom in the correct choie and have a more popular so..that in an incorrect choice and thus lure a test taker into choosing a wrong answer.
What do you think?
GMAT/MBA Expert
- ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
Sharp observation! You'll start to notice as you study that GMAT test writers have favorite idioms, and favorite ways of tricking your ear. This certainly seems to be one of them.Nina1987 wrote:Ceilidh,
GMAT seems to be particularly fond of this idiom. Here is another official example where this idiom appears in correct choice. -
The Emperor Augustus, it appears, commissioned an idealized sculptured portrait, the features of which are so unrealistic as to constitute what one scholar calls an "artificial face."
(A) so unrealistic as to constitute
(B) so unrealistic they constituted
(C) so unrealistic that they have constituted
(D) unrealistic enough so that they constitute
(E) unrealistic enough so as to constitute
I think what they do here is - have this slightly uncommon but correct idiom in the correct choie and have a more popular so..that in an incorrect choice and thus lure a test taker into choosing a wrong answer.
What do you think?
In this example, "so unrealistic that they constitute..." would have been perfectly correct, but that wasn't an option. Often, test-takers have an "ideal" version of what they want the answer to be, and will pick the closest answer to it. C would be the trap for that. Instead, we should evaluate each answer choice and ask "is there an error in grammar or meaning?" rather than asking "what would I want it to say?"
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education