BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Nutritionist: Your company’s fruit-processing technologies

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Jan 23, 2019 5:56 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Nutritionist: Your company's fruit-processing technologies add unacceptable amounts of copper to the orange juice you sell. Because copper blocks the absorption of Vitamin C, your advertising campaign claiming that your juice is a good source of Vitamin C is faulty and should be removed.

Juice Manufacturer: Some amount of copper is necessary for optimal health. Recent studies have shown that as many as 25 percent of Americans do not get enough copper in their diets; therefore, the benefits of the copper that our process adds to the juice outweigh the costs of any Vitamin C that it may block.

The juice manufacturer's response is flawed as a refutation of the nutritionist's argument because it

A relies on the unfounded assumption that copper may be as good for health as Vitamin C.
B does not address the issue of whether sufficient amounts of copper are present to invalidate its advertising claims.
C fails to describe how much Vitamin C the juice company adds to each bottle, as stated in the advertising campaign, and how much is blocked from absorption by copper.
D addresses the nutritionist's argument in general terms, rather than in terms of the health of individuals.
E shows that the nutritionist's evidence about copper is irrelevant but fails to demonstrate any flaws in the nutritionist's assumptions.

OA B

Source: Magoosh
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Fri Jan 25, 2019 6:01 pm
We first need to know the standpoint of each parties concerning the argument to correctly address this question.
Here, the Nutritionist is more concerned about points the company present in their advertisement.

Option A :- INCORRECT
What the company presented about their product is the vitamin C content. The Nutritionist succeeded in flooding their argument that it is impossible that it is impossible for their product to be a very good supplier of vitamin C and still contain given element that absorbs it.

Option B :- CORRECT
Checking question A above, the company cannot effectively defend the content of their advertisement , how can something still be effective in the presence presence of some other things that will inevitably affect its effectiveness. Hence the manufactures's response was considered as inadequate enough for justification's sake.

Option C :- INCORRECT
The level of justification cannot be measured from here, it is therefore inconclusive. We don't know if the quantity of vitamin A present in the juice is even enough for the copper to absorb, The response should have been flawless if the manufacturer had supplied the quantity of each substance present,

Option D :- INCORRECT
the manufacturer generalized the benefits of copper but this does not contribute to the flaws. He was only unable to convince the nutritionist how the presence of copper in their product will not affect the supply of the vitamin C.

Option E :- INCORRECT
No, the Nutritionist's argument about copper remains valid and does not reflect the flaws in the Nutritionist's Argument.
Join the discussion