dimonya wrote:ugh, such clumsy wording "not divisible by 2 and 3"
i read it as not divisible by 6.....
should be "not divisible by 2 and/or 3"
thats how u lose marks , darn it
an official gmat problem would NEVER contain ambiguous wording such as this. if this problem were official, it would contain "...not divisible by 2
or 3?"
two things, though.
1 * first of all, even though the gmat won't contain ambiguous problem statements**, you still must know the default meaning of certain terms in problem statements. for example, "two integers" are allowed to be the same (e.g., 5 and 5 are "two integers that multiply to give a product of 25"); "or" allows the possibility that
both things are true; etc.
2 * on this problem, the answer choices give away the problem's meaning, even though the wording is horrible. it's not hard to see that there are 50 numbers from 1-100 that aren't divisible by 2 (49, if the problem says "
between 1 and 100"), so the fact that all choices are under 49 resolves the ambiguity.
--
**the gmat will actually go out of its way to
avoid ambiguity in problem statements. for instance, it will specify, every time, that you should consider "positive factors", not just "factors". etc.
because the gmat
is this precise, make sure that you pay very, very close attention to the wording of problems, be very literal, and avoid making assumptions.
see OG11 data sufficiency #146 (don't post details here), on which you must actively avoid the assumption that the variable
n stands for an integer.
Last edited by
lunarpower on Sun Feb 08, 2009 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron