geometry

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 112
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 9:20 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:640

geometry

by sunilrawat » Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:08 am
In above figure, AC and AD divide angle EAB into three non-overlapping angles that are equal in measure. Is AB = AE?
1. AD=AC
2. AC=BC


Image
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 112
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 9:20 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:640

by sunilrawat » Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:17 am
OA A

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:18 pm
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:1 members

by top_business_2011 » Sat Aug 27, 2011 9:19 am
sunilrawat wrote:In above figure, AC and AD divide angle EAB into three non-overlapping angles that are equal in measure. Is AB = AE?
1. AD=AC
2. AC=BC


Image
Angle EAD = Angle DAC = Angle CAB, and let's represent them by 'x'

Required: Is length EA = AB

Statement 1: AD=AC
This means, angle ADC and angle ACD are equal, and let's call them 'y'.
Use the formula: the sum of the two internal angles = the outer angle.
: angle CDA + DAC = angle BCA. Similarly, angle DCA + angle CAD = angle ADE
= y + X = angle BCA. Similarly, y + x = angle ADE
So angle BCA = angle ADE
Now look at triangle AED and triangle ABC. See that? They have two equal corresponding angles; hence, their other corresponding angles must be equal. That is, angle AED = angle ABC. It follows from this that length of AE = Length of AB. Sufficient.

Statement 2: AC = CB
So angle CBA = angle CAB = X
This tells us that angle DCA= 2X [Using the same formula used above]
Similarly, angle EDA = 2X + X = 3X.

So triangle EDA has angle measures of X, 3X, and the unknown angle DEA.
All we can tell here is the sum of X, 3X, angle DEA = 180.
What is angle DEA? It can be x, in which case x =36, and in this case AE= AB, OR it can be 2x, in which case X = 30. And in this case, AE is not equal to AB.
Hence, Insufficient.

Sorry, if I haven't been that clear. You know....

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 112
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 9:20 am
Thanked: 5 times
GMAT Score:640

by sunilrawat » Sun Aug 28, 2011 9:09 am
Ahh, I missed x=36.
I was getting a "no" from statement 2.
top_business_2011 wrote:
sunilrawat wrote:In above figure, AC and AD divide angle EAB into three non-overlapping angles that are equal in measure. Is AB = AE?
1. AD=AC
2. AC=BC


Image
Angle EAD = Angle DAC = Angle CAB, and let's represent them by 'x'

Required: Is length EA = AB

Statement 1: AD=AC
This means, angle ADC and angle ACD are equal, and let's call them 'y'.
Use the formula: the sum of the two internal angles = the outer angle.
: angle CDA + DAC = angle BCA. Similarly, angle DCA + angle CAD = angle ADE
= y + X = angle BCA. Similarly, y + x = angle ADE
So angle BCA = angle ADE
Now look at triangle AED and triangle ABC. See that? They have two equal corresponding angles; hence, their other corresponding angles must be equal. That is, angle AED = angle ABC. It follows from this that length of AE = Length of AB. Sufficient.

Statement 2: AC = CB
So angle CBA = angle CAB = X
This tells us that angle DCA= 2X [Using the same formula used above]
Similarly, angle EDA = 2X + X = 3X.

So triangle EDA has angle measures of X, 3X, and the unknown angle DEA.
All we can tell here is the sum of X, 3X, angle DEA = 180.
What is angle DEA? It can be x, in which case x =36, and in this case AE= AB, OR it can be 2x, in which case X = 30. And in this case, AE is not equal to AB.
Hence, Insufficient.

Sorry, if I haven't been that clear. You know....

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:39 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 41 times
Followed by:6 members

by prateek_guy2004 » Sun Aug 28, 2011 2:21 pm
Its a Kaplan question ,just did that last week

Answer A
Don't look for the incorrect things that you have done rather look for remedies....

https://www.beatthegmat.com/motivation-t90253.html

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:24 pm
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:6 members

by navami » Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:17 am
IMO A
This time no looking back!!!
Navami