BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

number properties question - logically working through a qu.

Expert replies
by jsl » Fri Jul 11, 2008 6:51 am
How do you guys work through this question logically so that you can come to a definitive answer within 2 mins? I'm struggling as I keep confusing concepts...

What is the remainder when the positive integer x is divided by 4?

1. There is no remainder when 2x is divided by 4.
2. There is no remainder when x/2 is divided by 4.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:49 am
Let's try it

stmt1 says

2x%4 =0
==> 2x = 4k where k>0 k belongs to I

for k=1 x=2 ==> 2%4 =2 , for k=2 x=4==> 4%4 =0 not sufficient.

stmt 2 says

x/2%4=0
==> x/2 = 4k where k>0 k belongs to I

x = 8k for any value of k x%4 =0 Sufficient.

Answer B.
Please let me know OA.

Regards,
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion

by tzink » Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:23 am
Just jumping in this thread, but I didn't follow that explanation..
First, what's up with the percentage signs? I assume you mean division...
Also, what do you mean "K belongs to I"?
Where does the K come from/what does it mean?

Sorry noob questions...
Join the discussion

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:04 am
K belongs to set of all Integers

% = modulus operation i.e. 5%2 = remainder of 5 divided by 2


regards,
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion

by target790 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:27 am
(1)
2x/4 leaves no remainder where x={1,2....9}

In this scenario x can be 2,4,6 or 8

Not sufficient as there are multiple remainder options in this case.

(2)

x/8 leaves no remainder where x={1,2...9}

Only possible when x=8

So this option is sufficient.


Option B
Join the discussion

by jsl » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:11 pm
Official Answer is B
Join the discussion

by jsl » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:15 pm
target790 wrote:x/8 leaves no remainder where x={1,2...9}
Thanks for this part.... can you explain why you only tested integers from 1 to 9 inclusive? Is this a general rule I can apply to all integer testing questions such as this?
Join the discussion

by target790 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:36 pm
against this problem you can easily generalize.

Let me elaborate a bit more.


statement 1>x/2 where x can be any positive integer.So x should be multiples of 2(2,4,6,8.....)
In these even set you can't manage specific remainder when you divide by 4.

So this is not sufficient.


statement2>x/8 where x is any positive integers.
Now if x leaves no remainder when you divide by 8 the you can conclude easily that division by 4 will also not leave any remainder.

So this is sufficient.


Answer is B



Hope,it's now much more clear
Join the discussion