Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

number properties question - logically working through a qu.

Expert replies
by jsl » Fri Jul 11, 2008 6:51 am
How do you guys work through this question logically so that you can come to a definitive answer within 2 mins? I'm struggling as I keep confusing concepts...

What is the remainder when the positive integer x is divided by 4?

1. There is no remainder when 2x is divided by 4.
2. There is no remainder when x/2 is divided by 4.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:49 am
Let's try it

stmt1 says

2x%4 =0
==> 2x = 4k where k>0 k belongs to I

for k=1 x=2 ==> 2%4 =2 , for k=2 x=4==> 4%4 =0 not sufficient.

stmt 2 says

x/2%4=0
==> x/2 = 4k where k>0 k belongs to I

x = 8k for any value of k x%4 =0 Sufficient.

Answer B.
Please let me know OA.

Regards,
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion

by tzink » Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:23 am
Just jumping in this thread, but I didn't follow that explanation..
First, what's up with the percentage signs? I assume you mean division...
Also, what do you mean "K belongs to I"?
Where does the K come from/what does it mean?

Sorry noob questions...
Join the discussion

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:04 am
K belongs to set of all Integers

% = modulus operation i.e. 5%2 = remainder of 5 divided by 2


regards,
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion

by target790 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:27 am
(1)
2x/4 leaves no remainder where x={1,2....9}

In this scenario x can be 2,4,6 or 8

Not sufficient as there are multiple remainder options in this case.

(2)

x/8 leaves no remainder where x={1,2...9}

Only possible when x=8

So this option is sufficient.


Option B
Join the discussion

by jsl » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:11 pm
Official Answer is B
Join the discussion

by jsl » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:15 pm
target790 wrote:x/8 leaves no remainder where x={1,2...9}
Thanks for this part.... can you explain why you only tested integers from 1 to 9 inclusive? Is this a general rule I can apply to all integer testing questions such as this?
Join the discussion

by target790 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:36 pm
against this problem you can easily generalize.

Let me elaborate a bit more.


statement 1>x/2 where x can be any positive integer.So x should be multiples of 2(2,4,6,8.....)
In these even set you can't manage specific remainder when you divide by 4.

So this is not sufficient.


statement2>x/8 where x is any positive integers.
Now if x leaves no remainder when you divide by 8 the you can conclude easily that division by 4 will also not leave any remainder.

So this is sufficient.


Answer is B



Hope,it's now much more clear
Join the discussion