Cost

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

Cost

by heshamelaziry » Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:09 am
In a certain country, the retail price include a value added tax of 12 1/2 percent of the sum of the whole cost and the mark up of an item. If the value added tax on a certain jacket is 6 shillings, what is the wholesale cost of the tax in shillings ?

A) The mark-up represents 50 percent of the wholesale cost.

B) The mark-up of the jacket is 16 shillings.


D
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 399
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:48 am
Location: india
Thanked: 39 times

by xcusemeplz2009 » Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:35 am
vat=121/2%(w+m)
oe v=25/200(w+m)
v=vat=6
w=whole sale
m=mark up

s1)
m=1/2 w
so
6=(w+1/2w)*25/200
solv we can get w suff

S2)
m=16
so 6=1/8*(w+16)

solving we can get w suff

hence D
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up

Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

by heshamelaziry » Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:57 am
?! any easier or better laid down solution ? thanks

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 539 times
Followed by:164 members
GMAT Score:800

Re: Cost

by Testluv » Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:13 pm
Hi Hesham,

Here is the most powerful strategy in data sufficiency: If you have to solve for any of "n" unknowns, you require "n" number of linear distinct equations.

So, if a word problem gave you three unknowns, you would need three linear distinct equations. Let's say the unknowns are x, y, and z. And then, say, I told you x=5. This is an equation (because it has an equal sign). But is it sufficient to solve for y or z? Nope.

Now, let's say I told you z = 10. So, now we know that x = 5 and z = 10. Clearly, we know what x and z are. But can we solve for y with these two equations? Of course not: y is still unknown!

Because there are three unknowns, we would need three equations to solve for the value of any of the unknowns.

If you know this, then it can really decrease the difficulty of a lot of DS questions. In fact, you can use this strategy even if you don't know what an equation is; all you need to know is that there is an equation, and the number of unknowns.

Let's apply the strategy to this problem:

In a certain country, the retail price include a value added tax of 12 1/2 percent of the sum of the whole cost and the mark up of an item. If the value added tax on a certain jacket is 6 shillings, what is the wholesale cost of the tax in shillings ?

A) The mark-up represents 50 percent of the wholesale cost.

B) The mark-up of the jacket is 16 shillings.
Let's translate the English sentence into an algebraic sentence. When translating, know the important terms, go slow, and chunk it up.

We learn that retail price INCLUDES a tax. Includes is not the same as EQUAL. "Retail price" is a red herring here.

The rest of the first sentence gives us English for the tax equation. The tax (let's call tax T) is equal to: 12 1/2 percent of the sum of the whole cost and the mark up of an item.

We don't know the whole cost (so, let's call it WC) or the mark-up (so, let's call it MU). These are 2 unknowns.

The question is asking for WC (but it wouldn't have made a difference had the question been asking for MU).

The tax is 12.5 percent of the sum of those two unknowns.

So, what is their sum? WC + MU

We have to take 12.5 percent of this.

"of" usually means multiply in word problems:

Tax = 12.5%*(WC + MU)

We are told the tax was 6 shillings:

6 = 12.5% (WC + MU)

How many equal signs there?..1
And, how many unknowns (ie, letters) there?...2

We have one equation and two unknowns.

We will have sufficiency if we get an equation relating either WC or MU to a quantity (so long as there isn't a brand new unknown!)

We will have sufficiency if a statement gives us a value for WC or MU.

We will also have sufficiency if we get a special equation relating WC and MU.

ONLY now, after this analysis, are we ready to go to the statements.

Statement 1:

The mark-up represents 50 percent of the wholesale cost.

MU = 0.5*WC

So, in the original equation, we can replace "MU" with "0.5WC" and we would have sufficiency.

Of course, because it is data sufficiency we don't actually do that; we just know that we COULD do that.

Statement 1 is sufficient.

Statement 2 provides us with a value for one of our unknowns. Sufficient.

Choose D

Now, because it is data sufficiency, we didn't even have to write the original equation. We could just have noted that we had an equation relating tax to two unknowns, and said to ourselves: "I am in a one-equation and two-unkowns problem."
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 399
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:48 am
Location: india
Thanked: 39 times

by xcusemeplz2009 » Mon Nov 09, 2009 6:27 am
heshamelaziry wrote:?! any easier or better laid down solution ? thanks
in word problem type DS its enough to frame the eqn and then just check u r given suff informn to solve no need to solve...

with the q stem if the eqn is framed then we just need to know what informn is reqd to solve it...
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up