BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Cyclists

Expert replies
by Vemuri » Sun Mar 01, 2009 5:18 pm
Touring professional cyclists have been shown to have between 4 and 11 percent body fat. If we could all decrease our body fat to that level, we could all cycle at a world-class level.

Which statement(s) below accurately describe the flaw in the method of reasoning used in the above argument?

I. It assumes a causal relationship between two highly correlated events.
II. It suggestss that low body fat is a sufficient condition rather than a necessary condition for becoming a world-class cyclist.
III. Its conclusion is based on evidence which, in turn, is based on its conclusion.

A. I only
B. II only
C. I & II only
D. II & III only
E. All of the above
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Jatinder » Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:05 pm
I reckon A..

II- it assumes that 4-11 % body fat is necessary and sufficient
III- No circular reasoning here.
Keep flying
Join the discussion

by arjunn7 » Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:35 pm
IMO B..

Dude ( the person replied above )
the ques asks us to find the flawed assumption.. n The II statement gives us that..
Work Hard till You succeed.. N even after that..!!
Join the discussion

by delhiboy1979 » Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:33 am
I too would go with B although I cant make much sense of the third option.
Join the discussion

C

by poonam1279 » Mon Mar 02, 2009 7:12 am
IMO C
GMAT PREP 2-630
MGMAT (2):630
Join the discussion

by vanessa.m » Sat May 14, 2016 2:44 am
I'm pretty confident that B is correct answer.
Join the discussion