Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

North Sea

Expert replies
by aj5105 » Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:20 am
Which of the following best completes the passage below?
At a recent conference on environmental threats to the North Sea, most participating countries favored uniform controls on the quality of effluents, whether or not specific environmental damage could be attributed to a particular source of effluent. What must, of course, be shown, in order to avoid excessively restrictive controls, is that ___________.

(A) any uniform controls that are adopted are likely to be implemented without delay

(B) any substance to be made subject to controls can actually cause environmental damage

(C) the countries favoring uniform controls are those generating the largest quantities of effluents

(D) all of any given pollutant that is to be controlled actually reaches the North Sea at present

(E) environmental damage already inflicted on the North Sea is reversible
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by scoobydooby » Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:30 am
would go for B

A. implementation is out of scope.

B. correct. negate: if subtances subjected to control cannot cause damage, then the restrictions must be uncalled for/excessive.

C. doesnt affect argument.

D. irrelevant. only the threat to environment/potentiality is discussed in the conference, not whether it actually causes damage

E. out of scope.
Join the discussion

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:26 am
IMO Answer B:

A) irrelevant to the goal

B) Best choice

C) Out of scope

D) The use of the word "all" makes it an unlikely choice. If 95% of the effluent reaches the sea, with this choice, you wouldn't want to restrict it.

E) Out of scope, whether or not the effects are reversible is irrelevant to the plan of reducing and limiting further damage.
Join the discussion

by schumi_gmat » Fri Jun 12, 2009 7:54 am
IMO B,

Would like to see more explanations for eliminating C
Join the discussion

by vinaynp » Fri Jun 12, 2009 8:27 am
IMO B)

A) Out of scope.
C) Additional Information, not relevant.
D) Additional Information, not relevant.
E) It doesn't matter whether it is reversible or not.
Join the discussion

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Fri Jun 12, 2009 8:32 am
schumi_gmat wrote:IMO B,

Would like to see more explanations for eliminating C
I think C is wrong because the countries that generate the largest quantities of the effluents wouldn't be in favor of excessive restrictions. The conclusion wants a solution to ensure against excessive restrictions and the biggest offenders wouldn't be the people in favor of the biggest restrictions.
Join the discussion

by schumi_gmat » Fri Jun 12, 2009 8:39 am
Got it Osirus

Thanks a ton.
Join the discussion

by turbo jet » Sun Jun 14, 2009 7:22 am
IMO: B

Quick way of approaching this problem: (Ideas/ comments welcome)

Whats the conclusion: There should be controls on effluents
Whats my premise/ Reason why there should be controls: They cause environmental damage

B directly weakens my premise as it raises a doubt by questioning whether effluents will actually cause an environmental damage.

Cheers!!!
TJ




:)
Life is Tom; I am Jerry ;)
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Fri Jun 19, 2009 7:35 am
Hmm... why wouldn't the answer be E? If the effects weren't reversible, everything would become worse, which would cause more restrictions..
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 7:58 pm
I would go with option B as the correct option
Join the discussion