Using either (1) or (2) we can say Line AB is parallel to CD, but line FG can be drawn anyway such that it intersects the 2 lines at point E.
It could be drawn parallel as shown in the figure, or it could not be parallel and still intersect at point E. There is no info about FG in either options.
Should be EIMO
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
Circles DS - Tough one.
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
In the circle pictured with diameter CD, segments AD and BC intersect at point E. E lies on segment FG. Are the lines FG and AB parallel to CD?
(1) Triangle CED is isosceles with base CD.
=> ∠ECD = ∠EDC and EC = ED,
=> ∠AEB = CED and QE = EB,
=> AE/EC = BE/ED, ∠AEB = ∠CED => AB || CD (Similar triangles?)
Insufficient !
(2) ∠BAD = ∠ADC => AB||CD (Alternate Interior angles)
Insufficient !
No mention of FG.
(1) Triangle CED is isosceles with base CD.
=> ∠ECD = ∠EDC and EC = ED,
=> ∠AEB = CED and QE = EB,
=> AE/EC = BE/ED, ∠AEB = ∠CED => AB || CD (Similar triangles?)
Insufficient !
(2) ∠BAD = ∠ADC => AB||CD (Alternate Interior angles)
Insufficient !
No mention of FG.
Anil Gandham
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/
Yea, I don't think there's much more to say than that FG could be drawn in pretty much any way you want, and there is no mention of it in the statements.
Greg Michnikov, Founder of GMAT Boost
GMAT Boost offers 250+ challenging GMAT Math practice questions, each with a thorough video explanation, and 100+ GMAT Math video tips, each 90 seconds or less.
It's a total of 20+ hours of expert instruction for an introductory price of just $10.
View sample questions and tips without signing up, or sign up now for full access.
Also, check out the most useful GMAT Math blog on the internet here.
GMAT Boost offers 250+ challenging GMAT Math practice questions, each with a thorough video explanation, and 100+ GMAT Math video tips, each 90 seconds or less.
It's a total of 20+ hours of expert instruction for an introductory price of just $10.
View sample questions and tips without signing up, or sign up now for full access.
Also, check out the most useful GMAT Math blog on the internet here.
This question tricks you into over thinking the rules for similar triangles - asking how many angles you need and trying to figure that out. Meanwhile the quesiton never gives you any information regarding where FG is or any information about the angles related to FG. Therefore none of the statements are sufficient and the answer must be E.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA

















