BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

No one but him could have told them that the king was I.

Expert replies

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:55 am
Any form of the verb to be requires a subject pronoun such as I, he, she, they, we:

The king was I.
The king is he.


The above sentences might sound strange and feel awkward, but they are grammatically correct. The verb to be expresses a state of being. To be is like an equals sign. The order of the elements can be reversed:

I was the king. (So the king was I.)
He is the king. (So the king is he.)

We can't say:

Me was the king.

So it's incorrect to say:

The king was me. Eliminate B and C.

Another issue is he vs. him. Who could have told them? No one could have told them. He or him is the object of the word but, so we need to say but him, just as we would say no one except him. Eliminate D.

In E, had told them is the wrong tense. Eliminate E.

The correct answer is A.

Please note: case (he vs. him, I vs. me) typically is not tested on the GMAT.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by selango » Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:03 am
Thanks for the prompt reply Mitch...
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by crackinggmat » Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:10 am
Dare 2 .... im eagerly waiting to see the official explanation for this queastion.....
i still do not agree with the oa....
Join the discussion

by shweta.kalra » Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:52 am
HI MITCH,
HAD IT BEEN GIVEN
1 NO ONE AND I COULD HAV TOLD THEM THAT THE KING WAS I.
2 NO ONE OTHER THAN HIM COULD HAVE TOLD THEM THAT THE KING WAS I.

ARE BOTH SENTENCES CORRECT?
THANKS.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:25 am
shweta.kalra wrote:HI MITCH,
HAD IT BEEN GIVEN
1 NO ONE AND I COULD HAV TOLD THEM THAT THE KING WAS I.
2 NO ONE OTHER THAN HIM COULD HAVE TOLD THEM THAT THE KING WAS I.

ARE BOTH SENTENCES CORRECT?
THANKS.
#2 is correct. Please note that the words but and than can perform different functions:

Mary likes chocolate, but I prefer vanilla. (In this sentence, but is a conjunction joining two clauses. The pronoun I is the subject of the second clause.)

No one but me prefers vanilla. (In this sentence but is a preposition. The pronoun me is the object of the preposition but.)

Mary likes chocolate more than I. (Traditionalists will say that the word than is being used to compare the way Mary likes chocolate with the way I like chocolate, so the pronoun I is correct. Other grammarians think that it's ok to say Mary likes chocolate more than me, claiming that me is the object of the preposition than. Since there is debate, the issue will not be tested on the GMAT. In fact, issues of case typically are not tested on the GMAT.)

No one other than me likes vanilla. (Here there is no debate. The pronoun me is the object of the preposition than.)

Sentence #1 makes no sense. It's impossible that no one and I could have told them.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by shweta.kalra » Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:50 am
thanks again. mitch
Join the discussion