Nice Permutation and Combination Question

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:44 am

Nice Permutation and Combination Question

by Leo2008 » Fri Mar 21, 2008 2:18 pm
My Solution to this problem is different from what the textbook gives but I am very sure of my answer....and I think the book solved it the wrong way.


Two packs of 52 playing cards are shuffled together. Find the number of ways in which a man can be dealt 26 cards such that he does not get two cards of the same suit and same denomination ?

My answer is (2^26)(56!/26!)

the book answer is (2^26)(56C26)

Any explanation or thoughts ?

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 1:53 am
Location: Noida
Thanked: 4 times

by tomato1 » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:55 pm
how did u solve this qus.......i didn't get it..

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 1:53 am
Location: Noida
Thanked: 4 times

by tomato1 » Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:56 pm
how did u solve this qus.......i didn't get it..

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800
Leo2008 wrote:My Solution to this problem is different from what the textbook gives but I am very sure of my answer....and I think the book solved it the wrong way.


Two packs of 52 playing cards are shuffled together. Find the number of ways in which a man can be dealt 26 cards such that he does not get two cards of the same suit and same denomination ?

My answer is (2^26)(56!/26!)

the book answer is (2^26)(56C26)

Any explanation or thoughts ?
NOTE: i'll assume that you meant to type 52 in both places where you actually typed 56. if you really do mean 56, then i have no idea where you got that.

for reasons that i can't really pinpoint, this problem strikes me as unlike the authentic gmat probability problems.

nevertheless, on to the solution:

(actually i shouldn't say 'the' solution; more like 'one possible solution')

consider the number of options available for each card:
first card: 104 possibilities
second card: 102 possibilities (the first card is gone, and its counterpart from the other deck is ineligible to be selected)
third card: 100 possibilities (the first and second cards, as well as their counterparts, are gone)
fourth card: 98 possibilities
...
twenty-sixth card: 54 possibilities

so that's 104 x 102 x 100 x ... x 54
= (2x52) x (2x51) x (2x50) x ... x (2x27)
= (2^26) x (52x51x50x...x27)
= (2^26)(52!/26!)

this is probably where your solution stopped.

BUT

here's the problem: you have to account for redundancy. if you just multiply the possibilities, you have a permutation: i.e., if you get the same 26 cards in a different order, then you will (mistakenly) count that as 'different'. you don't want that to happen, so you have to divide by 26!, which is the number of different rearrangements in which each group of 26 cards will actually appear.

so you get
(2^26)(52! / 26!26!)
...and that's identical to the book solution.

btw, what book?
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:14 am

by ramamgr » Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:52 pm
Lunarpower, I liked your answer.