nice cr

IMO: C

IMO C
Negate this and the argument falls appart

Jatinder wrote:IMO C
Negate this and the argument falls appart

I like your explanation, short&simple.

imo:c

as said above: negation rule works best..

whts wrong with B ?

Negating B also works. i think

Negating B. supports the conclusion.

Negation -
If Percentage who attend college is not higher now......then by increase in the number of people to attend will increase the average salary. Hence it supports the arg.

ANS C

cn u also explain howcm c????????with the explantion ..how u negate that

using d negation rule on C


c:the higher average salary for jobs requiring a college degree is due largely to a scarcity among the kravonias workforce of people with a college degree

thus it says that the higher average salary is due to the scarcity of college degree people and not because the number of college dergree people are more...

Thus if this happens..
i.e if the number of college degree people increases=>the average salary will decrease..
this goes against the conclusion...thus the argument falls apart.

thx

I chose D.

I negated D and thot it broke the argument.

Clearly (C)

Answer C seems to be logical one out of other answer choices