nice cr
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 833
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
- Thanked: 13 times
- PussInBoots
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:47 am
- Thanked: 3 times
I like your explanation, short&simple.Jatinder wrote:IMO C
Negate this and the argument falls appart
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 833
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
- Thanked: 13 times
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 833
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
- Thanked: 13 times
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 am
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:2 members
Negating B. supports the conclusion.
Negation -
If Percentage who attend college is not higher now......then by increase in the number of people to attend will increase the average salary. Hence it supports the arg.
ANS C
Negation -
If Percentage who attend college is not higher now......then by increase in the number of people to attend will increase the average salary. Hence it supports the arg.
ANS C
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 833
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
- Thanked: 13 times
using d negation rule on C
c:the higher average salary for jobs requiring a college degree is due largely to a scarcity among the kravonias workforce of people with a college degree
thus it says that the higher average salary is due to the scarcity of college degree people and not because the number of college dergree people are more...
Thus if this happens..
i.e if the number of college degree people increases=>the average salary will decrease..
this goes against the conclusion...thus the argument falls apart.
thx
c:the higher average salary for jobs requiring a college degree is due largely to a scarcity among the kravonias workforce of people with a college degree
thus it says that the higher average salary is due to the scarcity of college degree people and not because the number of college dergree people are more...
Thus if this happens..
i.e if the number of college degree people increases=>the average salary will decrease..
this goes against the conclusion...thus the argument falls apart.
thx
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:00 am
- Location: USA
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:1 members