BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Newspaper editorial: In an attempt to reduce the crime rate,

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 amFollowed by: 13 members
Thanked: 88 times
by aspirant2011 » Sat May 14, 2011 4:45 am
Newspaper editorial: In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor's ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate's subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor's ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

[spoiler]OA: A vs C. Which one is better and why???[/spoiler]
Last edited by aspirant2011 on Sat May 14, 2011 7:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 amFollowed by: 13 members
Thanked: 47 times
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Sat May 14, 2011 5:04 am
I am with C.

On second thought I negated C and I found it as a strengthner... :(
But we need to get a weakner on negation...very tough
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 amFollowed by: 13 members
Thanked: 88 times

by aspirant2011 » Sat May 14, 2011 7:24 am
Hi HSPA,

Would be really thankful if you can explain in detail why option C is correct........

Also, in option C please clear one thing i.e "the group of inmates" are the inmates present one who are being denied the "access to college level course" or are the "inmates those who studied college level courses and after coming out have committed less crime".............
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 amFollowed by: 13 members
Thanked: 47 times
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Sat May 14, 2011 7:36 pm
aspirant2011 wrote:Hi HSPA,

Would be really thankful if you can explain in detail why option C is correct........

Also, in option C please clear one thing i.e "the group of inmates" are the inmates present one who are being denied the "access to college level course" or are the "inmates those who studied college level courses and after coming out have committed less crime".............
C is not correct. On negation I found C a strengthner. Typically on negating a choice it shall weaken the stem.

A is correct
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:09 am

by ajaarik » Sat May 14, 2011 8:22 pm
Ummm ....I am still with C.

It looks to me as a defender assumption. Consider a situation where these inmates who chose to take college-level courses were already less likely than other inmates to commit crime.
If this is true, I can not ascertain that taking up college level courses has any positive impact on the prisoners.

Btw,
What is that I am missing in A?
HSPA,
Can you help me understand why A is better?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 12:01 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 21 times
GMAT Score:720

by sourabh33 » Sat May 14, 2011 9:25 pm
+1 for C

Negating C we get - Inmates who chose to take college-level courses were already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released

So if they already were less likely to commit crime, then the effect of education may not be the reason for this group committing lesser no of crimes than other inmates.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 12:01 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 21 times
GMAT Score:720

by sourabh33 » Sat May 14, 2011 9:34 pm
Looking again at the question, I think both A & C, when negated, destroy the conclusion.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 amFollowed by: 13 members
Thanked: 47 times
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Sat May 14, 2011 10:33 pm
aspirant2011 wrote:Newspaper editorial: In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor's ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate's subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor's ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

[spoiler]OA: A vs C. Which one is better and why???[/spoiler]
Dear buddies,
If I negate C, I am getting a premise which is same as is marked and underlined above.. it is not weakening the conclusion.

If you have negated A and found it as a strenghter then you have done the same mistake as did I. missing the word 'counter'
Last edited by HSPA on Sat May 14, 2011 10:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 110
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:52 am
Thanked: 3 times

by M09 » Sat May 14, 2011 10:35 pm
aspirant2011 wrote:Newspaper editorial: In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor's ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate's subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor's ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

[spoiler]OA: A vs C. Which one is better and why???[/spoiler]
A tough one. I'm b/t A & C. I tried to break it down in simple words.
Conclusion: making harsh condition(not giving college-level courses) will increase crime
weakener: Even the cause is not there, effect is there. In other even if college level education is not there, crime will reduce.
Negating A does the same thing.
Negating C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
Doesn't weaken.
Experts please comment.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 12:01 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 21 times
GMAT Score:720

by sourabh33 » Sat May 14, 2011 10:40 pm
The following link should help.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/governor-and ... 21-15.html
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 242
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:49 am
Location: Delhi
Thanked: 6 times

by ranjeet75 » Sat May 14, 2011 10:56 pm
A - Being able to take college-level courses while in prison is likely to deter anyone from a
crime that he or she might otherwise have committed - I have removed negatives as double negative makes a positive.

C - The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were already more likely than
other inmates to commit crimes after being released - Done same thing as a

Both statements strengthen the conclusion and both offers to take courses not completing the course but C is stronger because it cites example of past (See the word 'were') and A uses the word 'might have' and is therefore of less impact.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 amFollowed by: 13 members
Thanked: 47 times
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Sat May 14, 2011 11:07 pm
Thanks for closing the thread sourav
sourabh33 wrote:The following link should help.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/governor-and ... 21-15.html
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1