BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

please help me #3

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Mississippi
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members

by Danielle » Wed Nov 28, 2007 12:27 pm
Regulating is correct, because regulating is not present tense, but is actually the imperfect past tense. They have the same spelling though, so it can look the same. The imperfect is used when an action took place over an extended period of time in the past, as the ordinance did. In fact, it was probably in effect over a number of years. After that, the sentence is a simple test of your knowledge of parallelism as the other verbs should all be in past tense.
Verbal Tutor
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 3:42 pm

by nobody29 » Wed Nov 28, 2007 3:59 pm
Thank you Danielle,
your explanation is very clear, I think.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 10:35 am
Thanked: 1 times

by beingAndNothing » Wed Nov 28, 2007 6:06 pm
Danielle:

Sometimes I get confused as to which verb should be in imperfect sentence.

If the sentence was written as:

A New York City ordinance of 1897 regulated the use of bicycles, mandating a maximum speed of eight miles an hour, requiring cyclists keep feet on pedals and hands on handlebars at all times, and granting pedestrians right-of-way.

Would this convey a similar meaning as (A) or the past tense of the verb "regulate" mean that ordinance is no longer in effect?

thanks.
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Mississippi
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members

by Danielle » Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:36 am
Okay, I need to correct myself here a bit. What I said about the imperfect tense and its usage is absolutely true, but I realized after looking at this again:

If you'll notice in the correct one (E), the first comma is deleted. It also corrects the sentence by changing 'regulated' to 'regulating'. "Regulating bicycles" is now an adjective phrase describing what the ordinance did, but it is not the verb of the sentence. Mandate, require, and grant are the verbs of the sentence, which is why they are in past tense, because the ordinance is no longer in effect.

That being said, the sentence as you wrote it is grammatically correct and expresses the same meaning -- . You could write it the way you listed and be perfectly fine, but unfortunately your construction wasn't an answer choice. :D
Verbal Tutor
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Mississippi
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members

by Danielle » Thu Nov 29, 2007 10:36 am
Okay, I need to correct myself here a bit. What I said about the imperfect tense and its usage is absolutely true, but I realized after looking at this again:

If you'll notice in the correct one (E), the first comma is deleted. It also corrects the sentence by changing 'regulated' to 'regulating'. "Regulating bicycles" is now an adjective phrase describing what the ordinance did, but it is not the verb of the sentence. Mandate, require, and grant are the verbs of the sentence, which is why they are in past tense, because the ordinance is no longer in effect.

That being said, the sentence as you wrote it is grammatically correct and expresses the same meaning -- . You could write it the way you listed and be perfectly fine, but unfortunately your construction wasn't an answer choice. :D
Verbal Tutor
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1