In a seven to four vote last week,Crane country officials decided to raise property taxes when it might have been expected for it to be lowered.
A. same as above
B. they might have been expected to have reduced them
C. they might have been expected that it should be reduced
D. its reducing might have been expected
E. there might have been an expectation for them to be reduced
B
I am not sure why this is the correct answer.
Can someone please clarify?
Need help
This topic has expert replies
- paritosh_b
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:51 am
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:36 am
- Thanked: 6 times
A. same as above - property taxes is plural, we can't use it, as it is singular...paritosh_b wrote:In a seven to four vote last week,Crane country officials decided to raise property taxes when it might have been expected for it to be lowered.
B. they might have been expected to have reduced them - best choice...
C. they might have been expected that it should be reduced - same reason as A
D. its reducing might have been expected - its - same reason as A plus usage of reducing introduces a parallelism error....
E. there might have been an expectation for them to be reduced - akward and wordy...
hope i was able to articulate.... What is the source of the q...
- Jim@Grockit
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:07 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Thanked: 162 times
- Followed by:45 members
- GMAT Score:760
Actually, in choice B, they refers to the Crane county officials, while them refers to the taxes.kapur.arnav wrote:A. same as above - property taxes is plural, we can't use it, as it is singular...paritosh_b wrote:In a seven to four vote last week,Crane country officials decided to raise property taxes when it might have been expected for it to be lowered.
B. they might have been expected to have reduced them - best choice...
C. they might have been expected that it should be reduced - same reason as A
D. its reducing might have been expected - its - same reason as A plus usage of reducing introduces a parallelism error....
E. there might have been an expectation for them to be reduced - akward and wordy...
hope i was able to articulate.... What is the source of the q...
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:59 am
- Thanked: 4 times
even though i selected B, i do not think the question is genuine. What is the source of the question?
I am not sure we can use 'they' and 'them' in the they are used in answer choice B
Can somebody answer this.
I am not sure we can use 'they' and 'them' in the they are used in answer choice B
Can somebody answer this.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:36 am
- Thanked: 6 times
absolutely!!!Jim@Grockit wrote:Actually, in choice B, they refers to the Crane county officials, while them refers to the taxes.kapur.arnav wrote:A. same as above - property taxes is plural, we can't use it, as it is singular...paritosh_b wrote:In a seven to four vote last week,Crane country officials decided to raise property taxes when it might have been expected for it to be lowered.
B. they might have been expected to have reduced them - best choice...
C. they might have been expected that it should be reduced - same reason as A
D. its reducing might have been expected - its - same reason as A plus usage of reducing introduces a parallelism error....
E. there might have been an expectation for them to be reduced - akward and wordy...
hope i was able to articulate.... What is the source of the q...